[board-discuss] Current state and needs of the admin team (was[DRAFT] Rules of Procedure for the TDF board)

2012-09-18 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi All, As the infrastructure team by design is working in the background[1] I'll pass some information for the public. [1] We're proud if nobody notes our work! ;o)) I'll try to keep it short.. Am 18.09.2012 19:56 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier: > Am 17.09.2012 18:06 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: >

Re: [board-discuss] Current state and needs of the admin team (was[DRAFT] Rules of Procedure for the TDF board)

2012-09-19 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > Citing §8: > Officers > > > §8. Systems and Administrative Officer > 1. The board will contract, or alternatively hire if more > economical/practical, resources for professional, secure, and > timely maintenance of TDF

Re: [board-discuss] Current state and needs of the admin team (was[DRAFT] Rules of Procedure for the TDF board)

2012-09-20 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Thorsten, *, Am 19.09.2012 19:36 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: > Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: [..] >> I can't see where the current admin team - plain volunteer based - did >> not cover the above mentioned requirements. Until now all services were >> available with reasonable uptime and quality.

Re: [board-discuss] Current state and needs of the admin team (was[DRAFT] Rules of Procedure for the TDF board)

2012-09-24 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > I continue not beeing happy, thinking typical community work to be paid > *by the TDF* (from which point should I present the bill for *my* work?) > I hear what you say, and it is indeed a point of concern. It is not without precedent though (it happened for a handful