Hi,
André Schnabel wrote on 2011-11-16 22:40:
another proposal: How about adding the e-mail addresses of the seat
holders? Might that make sense?
For what reason? (And in case you name one, why had'nt this be a reason
within the last year?)
was merely a gut feeling, but... you have a point
On 16 Nov 2011, at 14:16, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 18:59 +0100, André Schnabel wrote:
>> as noticed before, I published some new pages at the foundation website:
>>http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/
>
> Looks lovely ! :-) thanks for that. Hopefully it'
> André Schnabel wrote on 2011-11-16 18:59:
>> as noticed before, I published some new pages at the foundation website:
>> http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/
I would substitute the blurb about our previous involvement with OOo
with a statement of length, like "active in the OOo pro
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 18:59 +0100, André Schnabel wrote:
> as noticed before, I published some new pages at the foundation website:
> http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/
Looks lovely ! :-) thanks for that. Hopefully it'll shame Andreas,
Simon, Fridrich and Norbert into submi
Hi,
Am 16.11.2011 21:17, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> Hi,
>
> André Schnabel wrote on 2011-11-16 21:12:
>> I'd rather put these information only after the rules are legally safe
>> (means when the statutes have been accepted by the authorities).
>>
>> I know, the current content of the pages is
Hi,
Am 16.11.2011 22:16, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
>
> The page is broken in ie 9.0 win7 64bit.
> In FF and Chrome the page is ok.
>
> I'm ccing you to attach a screenshot.
> I have not the rights to change it for myself.
Well - I see the problem in your screenshot, but the page displays f
Hi André,
Am 16.11.2011 18:59, schrieb André Schnabel:
Hi,
as noticed before, I published some new pages at the foundation website:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/
Information is not final, as we still are in (but close to the end of)
the process of establishing the legal fo
Hi,
André Schnabel wrote on 2011-11-16 21:12:
I'd rather put these information only after the rules are legally safe
(means when the statutes have been accepted by the authorities).
I know, the current content of the pages is just a compromise.
another proposal: How about adding the e-mail ad
Hi,
Am 16.11.2011 19:05, schrieb Olivier Hallot:
> Hi André
>
> Perhaps we should put the terms of the boards and committees. In the
> case of the BoD it will be 2011-2012.
>
> What do you think?
I'd rather put these information only after the rules are legally safe
(means when the statutes hav
Hi,
André Schnabel wrote on 2011-11-16 18:59:
as noticed before, I published some new pages at the foundation website:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/
thanks a lot for your work!
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99
Hi André
Perhaps we should put the terms of the boards and committees. In the
case of the BoD it will be 2011-2012.
What do you think?
Regards
Olivier
Em 16-11-2011 15:59, André Schnabel escreveu:
Hi,
as noticed before, I published some new pages at the foundation website:
http://www.
Hi,
as noticed before, I published some new pages at the foundation website:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/
Information is not final, as we still are in (but close to the end of)
the process of establishing the legal foundation.
If you have requests (or obligations) for furth
12 matches
Mail list logo
