Also, as I made it clear, what is not on the marketing list will be ignored.
On 10/24/20 5:51 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
> It's a shame that this discussion is not taking place on the marketing
> list where we have been asked to discuss. This thread will not be read
> by the others on the marketing list
It's a shame that this discussion is not taking place on the marketing
list where we have been asked to discuss. This thread will not be read
by the others on the marketing list and will miss all of both of your
good points to the discussion.
Marc
Le 2020-10-23 à 15 h 27, Telesto a écrit :
> Offi
“LibreOffice from The Document Foundation” — like we’ve always had,
with the sole addition of “from”.
The other editions can be “LibreOffice Enterprise (from/by) X”, with
additional CIB/Collabora logos/tags.
This is as cristal-clear as it can be for anybody.
I reject any additional tag to the TDF
Official Edition is confusing. Which suggests there is also a Unofficial
edition.
A copy cat fork? Or are those LTS releases powered by clones, trying to
make a profit from TDF LibreOffice
A normal framework would be regular and LTS releases. However this
distinction not totally working out as
