>
> I understand your concerns. However, I second Thorsten's thoughts here,
> that for an entity built up as TDF, and for the way we act, the intended
> meaning of § 5 is suitable.
>
> Let's see how things develop in the future. We can always adjust the rules
> of procedure should we see things don
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote on 2013-01-24 16:45:
Thanks for the explanations and as Florian says that "... I hope it
remains an exception ..."
I have to say still, that, having sat on quite a few committees, the
rules of quorum are such that if it not reached, and where there is a
planned vote on
wastes time and trivialises the importance of the work the board
does.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Marc Paré
>To: board-discuss@documentfoundation.org
>Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2013, 15:45
>Subject: [board-discuss] Re: Joining Sili
Hi Florian and Thorsten,
Le 2013-01-24 04:51, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Is the application of the "BoD § 5 I rule" not for only votes taken when
a quorum is reached? It just seems strange to allow voting like this.
this is the intention of the § 5 rules of procedur
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> >Is the application of the "BoD § 5 I rule" not for only votes taken when
> >a quorum is reached? It just seems strange to allow voting like this.
>
> this is the intention of the § 5 rules of procedure. It is designed
> that board members who are not active and miss v
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote on 2013-01-24 05:25:
While I agree totally with joining Silicon Sentier, I was wondering how
the BoD can run a vote when there is no quorum reached for the meeting?
Are business for the meeting not cancelled and must be re-scheduled for
proper discussion at a future meet
Hi Florian and BoD,
While I agree totally with joining Silicon Sentier, I was wondering how
the BoD can run a vote when there is no quorum reached for the meeting?
Are business for the meeting not cancelled and must be re-scheduled for
proper discussion at a future meeting with quorum?
Is th
