On 21/03/2011 14:15, Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Von: sophie
(sorry, spent the last two day answering the question "What is
different (to OOo)" and
"Why did you do this (LobO/TDF)" about 1000times (at least it felt
like that) :)
Ho, so you know what kind of T-shirt we should produce next time
Hi,
> Von: sophie
> >
> > (sorry, spent the last two day answering the question "What is
> > different (to OOo)" and
> > "Why did you do this (LobO/TDF)" about 1000times (at least it felt
> > like that) :)
> Ho, so you know what kind of T-shirt we should produce next time:
> 'What is differe
Hi André,
On 21/03/2011 10:26, André Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.03.2011 12:13, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
So, we still miss André's and Caolan's vote before we formally close
this
vote.
+1
(sorry, spent the last two day answering the question "What is
different (to OOo)" and
"Why did you d
Thank you everyone!
The vote is now formally closed.
Best,
Charles.
2011/3/21 André Schnabel
> Hi,
>
>
> Am 20.03.2011 12:13, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
>
> So, we still miss André's and Caolan's vote before we formally close this
>> vote.
>>
>
> +1
>
> (sorry, spent the last two day answerin
Hi,
Am 20.03.2011 12:13, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
So, we still miss André's and Caolan's vote before we formally close this
vote.
+1
(sorry, spent the last two day answering the question "What is different
(to OOo)" and
"Why did you do this (LobO/TDF)" about 1000times (at least it felt li
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 11:38 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
> > approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
> > LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not o
So, we still miss André's and Caolan's vote before we formally close this
vote.
Please SC members, cast your vote if you havent't done so yet.
Thank you,
Charles.
2011/3/19 Charles-H. Schulz
> Le Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:05:39 -0300,
> Olivier Hallot a écrit :
>
> > +1
> >
> > Em 17-03-2011 15:47,
Le Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:05:39 -0300,
Olivier Hallot a écrit :
> +1
>
> Em 17-03-2011 15:47, Charles-H. Schulz escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for
> > a formal approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online
> > component for Lib
+1
Em 17-03-2011 15:47, Charles-H. Schulz escreveu:
Hi,
As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not of course diminish our
present efforts
Hi,
Thorsten Behrens wrote on 2011-03-18 11.38:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
> approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
> LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not of course dim
Hi all,
On 18/03/2011 13:38, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not of course diminish
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
> approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
> LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not of course diminish our
> present efforts on LibreOffice.
>
+1
, bu
On 03/17/2011 07:47 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not of course diminish our
present efforts on Libre
Hi,
As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not of course diminish our
present efforts on LibreOffice.
Please vote +1 or -1.
Best,
Charles.
14 matches
Mail list logo
