[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13506256#comment-13506256
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-49:
-
In order to fix this issue, I think we need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532756#comment-13532756
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-49:
-
this issue will fail speculative read. move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543620#comment-13543620
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-49:
-
move it back to 4.3.0. since it wasn't the r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13547620#comment-13547620
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-49:
-
thanks [~mmerli]. this patch is actually sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575493#comment-13575493
]
Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-49:
[~mmerli] Thanks for the idea & patch. Its goo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575867#comment-13575867
]
Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-49:
Rakesh, I think that there should be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575900#comment-13575900
]
Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-49:
Oh ok. Once BOOKKEEPER-558 is in, will revisit
