Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
There is what that particular implementation does with its extensions
and there are various mulit-threading models, what the standard
language is defined to be and ways to extend it to support
multi-thread and thread
local storage. In that regard, bugs in either the
From: Phil Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Rob Stewart]
There can still be a smart_ptr class, even if there's a
smart_resource class. Both may be separate manifestations,
possibly sharing some implementation details, of a SmartResource
concept. Equally plausible, smart_ptr could be implemented
I would be searching namely for smart_ptr. I know that smart pointer is
the name for the resource management idiom.
[David Gomboc]
But those that don't would look for resource_manager or resource_mgr
(and might even find res_mgr). The smart_ prefix is quite useless in
this context, there
Hi all,
Sorry I've been off air for a bit. I'll try to answer as much as I can in
this email.
Daniel Frey wrote:
I also think it would be fair to mention Dave as a contributor, too,
as he provided the way to reduce the overhead.
Of course, that bit was still there from the first time through,
The column headings in the first table are displaced to the left
( see ECMAScript - comparing ECMA and POSIX regular expressions )
Yes, thanks, the document has been through the MS Word mangle, and it shows
:-(
John.
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
[Terje Slettebø]
I also think this makes sense. However, I'm wondering how much commonality
there is in such a broader concept. This is kind of making a library
implementation of the RAII idiom, and we have that already, in the form of
constructors/destructors.
Yes.. it's ctors and dtors that
Alexander Nasonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cannot post to gname.comp.lib.boost.user because authorization doesn't
work. I receive an authorization request, reply to it but there is no
confirmation that I have been authorized and there is no post. goost.test
works just fine.
This is the
Sam Partington wrote:
Daniel Frey wrote:
I also think it would be fair to mention Dave as a contributor, too,
as he provided the way to reduce the overhead.
Of course, that bit was still there from the first time through, also
whoever came up with the original unspecified-bool-type
Hi All,
I'm participating in pretty complicated scientific
project. I'm thinking to deploy a library which helps
me to deal with measurement units. As far as I see,
SIunits from Walter E. Brown is the most advanced one.
Do anybody has experience with SIunits? Where to
download it today? Do other
Alexander Dz wrote:
Hi All,
I'm participating in pretty complicated scientific
project. I'm thinking to deploy a library which helps
me to deal with measurement units. As far as I see,
SIunits from Walter E. Brown is the most advanced one.
Do anybody has experience with SIunits? Where to
Hi Terje,
[...]
But you don't write library, put a seal on it, and stop. There's nothing
wrong
with making it more flexible when users demand it. As it stands, only few
persons are interested in the simplest facilities. Is it worth spending
time
on completely generic/flexible
Terje Slettebø wrote:
Right. There was a suggestion for allowing generic formats, though, using
the same format for all instantiations of a template. The question is how
to do it. The current version stores the format for each specific type, as
you say. Volodya suggested a couple of ways it
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
[...]
void foo(optionalA const )
{
}
int main()
{
optionalB b;
optionalC c;
foo(b);
//foo(c);
}
There is a bool (m_initialized) that will prevent the pointer to access
directly the virtual table. It may not be the case if the boolean was
Hello Alexander,
The issue regarding physical unit types has been raised a couple of times on
this newsgroup; however no agreement has been reached so far concerning the
functionalities such a library should provide, nor on its design.
I developed a small library for that purpose (new version
Dave,
Could you please suggest a patch for the regression tests which will
detect this problem? It's always better to get the test to fail
first before we check in any fixes.
Yep. I'll work on something to pass on to Jens for inclusion latter.
There is no simple patch for the regression
Edward Diener said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
Edward Diener said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
I still don't think it is a TLS issue but rather a thread cleanup
issue and the restrictions imposed by MS's design of that situation.
So I can well understand your chagrin at the tricks you must do in
Terje Slettebø wrote:
From: Jason House [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would suspect that chars don't get output with '' around them...
Right. I was just thinking C++ code, here. :)
Is there even a way to specify/change that?
It isn't currently, as the fundamental types aren't handled as
Hi Boosters,
I'd like to ask for scheduling a formal review for the string algorithm library.
It is mostly finished ( only some final polishing of the documentation is in progress
).
Its implementation can be found in the boost sandbox.
( Is it required to upload it to yahoo groups before the
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
This is an excellent point. One doesn't go looking for a class
named smart_ptr or a library named Boost.SmartPointer when
looking to manage the lifetime of some arbitrary resource. When
one uses pointers, it makes sense.
I would be searching namely for smart_ptr.
-Original Message-
From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, I don't recall that one. Care to refresh my memory? ;-)
Maybe they're the same discussion...
Yes, that was the discussion, and I apparently remembered things
incorrectly. Thanks for the refresher.
Jason
Jonathan
Caves, Herb
Sutter, and I will be hosting a webchat on C++ conformance
in VC7.1 (aka Everett)
tomorrow (2/27, 1PM PST).
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/chats/
for details.
My thanks to the Boost
moderators for allowing this announcement.
Jason Shirk
VC++ Compiler Team
At 02:37 PM 2/26/2003, Jason Shirk wrote:
Jonathan Caves, Herb Sutter, and I will be hosting a webchat on C++
conformance in VC7.1 (aka Everett) tomorrow (2/27, 1PM PST).
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/chats/ for details.
My thanks to the Boost moderators for allowing this announcement.
From: Phil Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Terje Slettebø]
I also think this makes sense. However, I'm wondering how much
commonality
there is in such a broader concept. This is kind of making a library
implementation of the RAII idiom, and we have that already, in the form
of
I just found a small bug of my implementation of NRVO-friendly operators.
Nothing serious, I just forgot to respect the setting of
BOOST_FORCE_SYMMETRIC_OPERATORS for the shift-operators. I already fixed
it in CVS. I hope this is OK without asking on the list first as I just
fixed my own stupid
At 04:34 PM 2/26/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:
I just found a small bug of my implementation of NRVO-friendly operators.
Nothing serious, I just forgot to respect the setting of
BOOST_FORCE_SYMMETRIC_OPERATORS for the shift-operators. I already fixed
it in CVS. I hope this is OK without asking on the
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:45:59 +0100, Beman Dawes wrote:
No, we still haven't branched. The tentative target is tomorrow morning
(US East Coast Time).
Just in time :)
So go ahead and commit your fix on the main trunk.
Done.
Regards, Daniel
___
William E. Kempf wrote:
Edward Diener said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
Edward Diener said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
I still don't think it is a TLS issue but rather a thread cleanup
issue and the restrictions imposed by MS's design of that
situation. So I can well understand your chagrin at the
Edward Diener said:
I can give you some names. I could also give some e-mail addresses,
though that might be considered bad netiquette. But MS *does* have
someone who's supposed to champion for us developers... Herb Sutter.
If you want to campaign for this, send him a polite e-mail and I'm
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:17:28 +0100
From: Hubert Holin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Message: 3
Somewhere in the E.U., le 25/02/2003
Bonjour
In
Hi,
I played today with some links validation software and set it upon
www.boost.org
Here the results for those who is interested.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/BrokenLinksReport.htm
I took care about Boost.Test issues.
Gennadiy.
___
30 matches
Mail list logo
