Hi,
I played today with some links validation software and set it upon
www.boost.org
Here the results for those who is interested.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/BrokenLinksReport.htm
I took care about Boost.Test issues.
Gennadiy.
___
U
Wait a minute!
Variant is up to review till the Sunday 2nd. And I am planning to supply my
comments.
Gennadiy.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:17:28 +0100
From: Hubert Holin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: list
Message: 3
Somewhere in the E.U., le 25/02/2003
Bonjour
The formal review for the updated Boost I/O Library begins today and runs through
March 7.
The I/O library contains various components for use with the standard I/O library.
The components are as follows:
State-saving classes for various IOStream attributes.
Class templates to ease making s
Here is my simple test code modified from embedding.cpp test code(by Dirk Gerrits).
I successfully compiled, but my excutable raise heap error assertion when the time
freeing the string result of the function py.hello().
Can I prevent this error?
My sampel code and result is below.
// mai
Pavel,
>Official patch 4 was released just now:
>
>http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,29793,00.html
>
>
>Among bugs fixed is:
>- The bcc compiler now compiles code containing a const member function.
Hum... Interesting... Thanks for letting me know.
There is also another fix that might help so
Is there any interest in a fixed point math library. Using templates the
compiler can keep track of the radix point for you making using fixed
point math a lot less tedious and error prone.
Attached is a rudimentary implementation which would work acceptably when
the exponent is not too large
Edward Diener said:
>> I can give you some names. I could also give some e-mail addresses,
>> though that might be considered bad netiquette. But MS *does* have
>> someone who's supposed to champion for us developers... Herb Sutter.
>> If you want to campaign for this, send him a polite e-mail a
William E. Kempf wrote:
> Edward Diener said:
>> William E. Kempf wrote:
>>> Edward Diener said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
I still don't think it is a TLS issue but rather a thread cleanup
issue and the restrictions imposed by MS's design of that
situation. So I can well understan
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:45:59 +0100, Beman Dawes wrote:
> No, we still haven't branched. The tentative target is tomorrow morning
> (US East Coast Time).
Just in time :)
> So go ahead and commit your fix on the main trunk.
Done.
Regards, Daniel
___
U
At 04:34 PM 2/26/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:
>I just found a small bug of my implementation of NRVO-friendly operators.
>Nothing serious, I just forgot to respect the setting of
>BOOST_FORCE_SYMMETRIC_OPERATORS for the shift-operators. I already fixed
>it in CVS. I hope this is OK without asking on t
I just found a small bug of my implementation of NRVO-friendly operators.
Nothing serious, I just forgot to respect the setting of
BOOST_FORCE_SYMMETRIC_OPERATORS for the shift-operators. I already fixed
it in CVS. I hope this is OK without asking on the list first as I just
fixed my own stupid ove
>From: "Phil Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [Terje Slettebø]
> > I also think this makes sense. However, I'm wondering how much
commonality
> > there is in such a broader concept. This is kind of making a library
> > implementation of the RAII idiom, and we have that already, in the form
of
> > const
At 02:37 PM 2/26/2003, Jason Shirk wrote:
>Jonathan Caves, Herb Sutter, and I will be hosting a webchat on C++
>conformance in VC7.1 (aka Everett) tomorrow (2/27, 1PM PST).
>
>See http://msdn.microsoft.com/chats/ for details.
>
>My thanks to the Boost moderators for allowing this announcement.
Eve
Jonathan
Caves, Herb
Sutter, and I will be hosting a webchat on C++ conformance
in VC7.1 (aka Everett)
tomorrow (2/27, 1PM PST).
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/chats/
for details.
My thanks to the Boost
moderators for allowing this announcement.
Jason Shirk
VC++ Compiler Team
> -Original Message-
> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hmm, I don't recall that one. Care to refresh my memory? ;-)
> Maybe they're the same discussion...
>
Yes, that was the discussion, and I apparently remembered things
incorrectly. Thanks for the refresher.
Jason
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
>> This is an excellent point. One doesn't go looking for a class
>> named "smart_ptr" or a library named "Boost.SmartPointer" when
>> looking to manage the lifetime of some arbitrary resource. When
>> one uses pointers, it makes sense.
>
> I would be searching namely f
Hi Boosters,
I'd like to ask for scheduling a formal review for the string algorithm library.
It is mostly finished ( only some final polishing of the documentation is in progress
).
Its implementation can be found in the boost sandbox.
( Is it required to upload it to yahoo groups before the
Terje Slettebø wrote:
>
> >From: "Jason House" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I would suspect that chars don't get output with '' around them...
>
> Right. I was just thinking C++ code, here. :)
>
> > Is there even a way to specify/change that?
>
> It isn't currently, as the fundamental types aren't
Edward Diener said:
> William E. Kempf wrote:
>> Edward Diener said:
>>> William E. Kempf wrote:
>>> I still don't think it is a TLS issue but rather a thread cleanup
>>> issue and the restrictions imposed by MS's design of that situation.
>>> So I can well understand your chagrin at the tricks yo
Dave,
Could you please suggest a patch for the regression tests which will
detect this problem? It's always better to get the test to fail
first before we check in any fixes.
Yep. I'll work on something to pass on to Jens for inclusion latter.
There is no simple patch for the regression test.
Hello Alexander,
The issue regarding physical unit types has been raised a couple of times on
this newsgroup; however no agreement has been reached so far concerning the
functionalities such a library should provide, nor on its design.
I developed a small library for that purpose (new version under
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
[...]
> void foo(optional const &)
> {
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> optional b;
> optional c;
>
> foo(b);
> //foo(c);
> }
There is a bool (m_initialized) that will prevent the pointer to access
directly the virtual table. It may not be the case if the boo
Terje Slettebø wrote:
> Right. There was a suggestion for allowing generic formats, though, using
> the same format for all instantiations of a template. The question is how
> to do it. The current version stores the format for each specific type, as
> you say. Volodya suggested a couple of ways i
Hi Terje,
[...]
> > But you don't write library, put a seal on it, and stop. There's nothing
>
> wrong
>
> > with making it more flexible when users demand it. As it stands, only few
> > persons are interested in the simplest facilities. Is it worth spending
> > time
> > on completely generic/fl
Alexander Dz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm participating in pretty complicated scientific
> project. I'm thinking to deploy a library which helps
> me to deal with measurement units. As far as I see,
> SIunits from Walter E. Brown is the most advanced one.
>
> Do anybody has experience with SIunits? Whe
Hi All,
I'm participating in pretty complicated scientific
project. I'm thinking to deploy a library which helps
me to deal with measurement units. As far as I see,
SIunits from Walter E. Brown is the most advanced one.
Do anybody has experience with SIunits? Where to
download it today? Do other
Sam Partington wrote:
>
> Daniel Frey wrote:
> > I also think it would be fair to mention Dave as a contributor, too,
> > as he provided the way to reduce the overhead.
>
> Of course, that bit was still there from the first time through, also
> whoever came up with the original "unspecified-bool-
Alexander Nasonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I cannot post to gname.comp.lib.boost.user because authorization doesn't
> work. I receive an authorization request, reply to it but there is no
> confirmation that I have been authorized and there is no post. goost.test
> works just fine.
This i
[Terje Slettebø]
> I also think this makes sense. However, I'm wondering how much commonality
> there is in such a broader concept. This is kind of making a library
> implementation of the RAII idiom, and we have that already, in the form of
> constructors/destructors.
Yes.. it's ctors and dtors t
>The column headings in the first table are displaced to the left
>( see ECMAScript - comparing ECMA and POSIX regular expressions )
Yes, thanks, the document has been through the MS Word mangle, and it shows
:-(
John.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes
Hi all,
Sorry I've been off air for a bit. I'll try to answer as much as I can in
this email.
Daniel Frey wrote:
> I also think it would be fair to mention Dave as a contributor, too,
> as he provided the way to reduce the overhead.
Of course, that bit was still there from the first time through
> > I would be searching namely for smart_ptr. I know that smart pointer is
> > the name for the resource management idiom.
[David Gomboc]
> But those that don't would look for "resource_manager" or "resource_mgr"
> (and might even find "res_mgr"). The smart_ prefix is quite useless in
> this co
>From: "Phil Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [Rob Stewart]
> > There can still be a smart_ptr class, even if there's a
> > smart_resource class. Both may be separate manifestations,
> > possibly sharing some implementation details, of a SmartResource
> > concept. Equally plausible, smart_ptr could b
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> There is what that particular implementation does with its extensions
> and there are various mulit-threading models, what the standard
> language is defined to be and ways to extend it to support
> multi-thread and thread
> local storage. In that regard, bugs in either
> > As a newbie, I lean towards the first argument. I want to learn about
> > the boost libraries for future use, but I also feel that all coding
> > resources should be as idiot proof as possible. The idea being that
> > people will look at the library list and not realize that they should be
I cannot post to gname.comp.lib.boost.user because authorization doesn't
work. I receive an authorization request, reply to it but there is no
confirmation that I have been authorized and there is no post. goost.test
works just fine.
--
Alexander Nasonov
Remove - m y c o p from my e-mail addre
37 matches
Mail list logo
