Beman Dawes wrote:
There are going to be several talks about Boost libraries
or related topics at the ACCU conference in Oxford, UK,
April 2nd through 5th:
I'm going to present dynamic_any library there after the main program (
Birds of a Feather meetings section). Though it's not yet in
Hi,
the attached patch fixes two typos in the release procedures document.
Regards,
m
Index: release_procedures.htm
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/more/release_procedures.htm,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 09:00 AM 2/18/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Hi there,
currently, the is_member_func_test fails for VACPP6 with the following
error messages:
/home/auto/schoepf/src/extern/boost-cvs/boost/type_traits/is_member_functio
n_pointer.hpp,
line 37.29: 1540-1206 (S) The
Hi all,
I have to port a Linux application that is using spirit on the VS. NET 2003.
Unfortunately
the current release of the spirit is crashing the VC++ 2003 compiler, so I
asked the spirit
guys when the next version (1.5.2) will be released.
Their answer was that the next version will be
Jaap Suter wrote:
[snip]
#ifdef BOOST_STATIC_NDEBUG
#define BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT( B ) BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_IMPL( true )
#else
#define BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT( B ) BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_IMPL( B )
#endif
Yes much better. I don't see any problems with this, does anyone?
Regards,
Dirk Gerrits
Geurt Vos said:
Just downloaded the 1.30.0-beta1 zip. There boost/thread.hpp
is slightly wrong. Line 16 reads:
#include boost/thread/conditin.hpp
but should be:
#include boost/thread/condition.hpp
Fixed. Thanks.
--
William E. Kempf
I really appreciate the boost rpms that have been made available. I hope we
can improve one thing in the upcoming release.
rpm -q --requires boost-python-devel
boost-devel
libpython-devel
Unfortuantely, on RedHat it's called
python-devel
I hope there is some way to fix this.
Just a quick question: Are the changes made on the thread_dev branch
for the thread library going to make it into the 1.30.0 release or are
they being held back for a future release?
Thanks
Russell
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 18:46:47 -0500, David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, why hardcoding that dependency?
You don't have to; it was just an example implementation. Another
implementation would be:
template class T
struct const_min
{
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, value = /*whatever*/);
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 20:23:39 -0500, David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comeau says [...]
In C++: A function definition ... does not end with a semicolon
nitpick
A function definition appearing within a class definition may end with
a semicolon though:
class X {
void foo() {}; //
- Original Message -
From: Joel de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] When will be the next boost released?
vc wrote:
Hi all,
I have to port a Linux application that is
vc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Joel de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] When will be the next boost released?
vc wrote:
Hi all,
I have
#define BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT( B ) \
typedef void BOOST_JOIN(boost_static_assert_typedef_, __LINE__)
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 20:23:39 -0500, David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is ; legal where a declaration is expected?
class X
{
; // legal?
};
No. C++ has a null statement (expression-statement without the
expression part) but not no null declaration. The grammar seems to
allow it but that
We just got this message on the LyX bug-tracker.
This is from the RC_1_30_0 branch, is there any fixed planned for
1.30.0 proper?
---BeginMessage---
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=935
Summary: boost does not compile with Sun CC
Product: LyX
Version:
No, as the guys from spirit told me that the 1.5.1 version was released
before VS. NET 2003
so their code is not designed for this new compiler. And indeed 2 weeks ago
I took the spirit
sources from the cvs and I didn't get that error anymore.
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams
vc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you reported this to Microsoft?
No, as the guys from spirit told me that the 1.5.1 version was
released before VS. NET 2003 so their code is not designed for this
new compiler.
That doesn't matter; any INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR represents a
compiler bug that
Joel de Guzman wrote:
I have to port a Linux application that is using spirit on
the VS. NET
2003. Unfortunately the current release of the spirit is
crashing the
VC++ 2003 compiler,
You mean VC7.1 is crashing?
so I asked the spirit
guys when the next version (1.5.2) will be
CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src -I../../../../boost
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/local/include -c
cregex.cpp ../../../../boost/boost/type_traits/add_const.hpp, line
34: Warning: Too few arguments in macro BOOST_PP_CHECK_2.
Paul Mensonides [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src -I../../../../boost
| -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/local/include -c
| cregex.cpp ../../../../boost/boost/type_traits/add_const.hpp, line
| 34: Warning: Too few arguments in macro
Hi,
We got access to a brand-new HP Itanium2 machine. Compiling with the
pre-installed gcc 2.96 seems to go fine, but I had to patch
boost/detail/limits.hpp. See below. I am just guessing that BOOST_BIG_ENDIAN is
correct for the Itanium2. Does anybody here know if this is correct? Is there a
vc wrote:
No, as the guys from spirit told me that the 1.5.1 version was
released before VS. NET 2003
so their code is not designed for this new compiler. And indeed 2
weeks ago
I took the spirit
sources from the cvs and I didn't get that error anymore.
No that's not correct. VC7.1 is
If evaluating the output of the code below counts as a
quick-and-easy-and-conclusive test the result is that the Itanium2 must be
BOOST_LITTLE_ENDIAN like the i386 and Alpha lines. I.e. my patch needs to be
revised (see below).
I am happy to report that Boost.Python works both with gcc 2.96 and
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If evaluating the output of the code below counts as a
quick-and-easy-and-conclusive test the result is that the Itanium2 must be
BOOST_LITTLE_ENDIAN like the i386 and Alpha lines. I.e. my patch needs to be
revised (see below).
I am happy
--- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am happy to report that Boost.Python works both with gcc 2.96 and Intel
7.0
on the Itanium2. The patch below is the only modification required. Would
it be
OK to check this into the RC_1_30_0 branch?
Go for it! You don't need to ask
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
If evaluating the output of the code below counts as a
quick-and-easy-and-conclusive test the result is that the Itanium2
must be BOOST_LITTLE_ENDIAN like the i386 and Alpha lines. I.e. my
patch needs to be revised (see below).
Remember that Itanium(2) can use
I've been trying to get the xml samples to work on Mac OS X, CW 8.3
today with no success. I get the following assertion in range_run.ipp:
Assertion (r.is_valid()) failed in range_run.ipp, function set,
line 132
This assertion is the result of the following call in the
xml_grammar::definition
If I have a token_iterator, is there any way for me to get an iterator
into the original string that corresponds to the position of the
token_iterator? I have some code where I want to create a tokenizer from a
string, get some tokens from it, then return the remainder of the string,
ignoring
Anyway, as Terje says, if the compile-time cost of the static
assertion is mainly in the evaluation of the condition then the
'release mode' definition could simply be
#define BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(c) \
typedef char boost_static_assert_typedef
When using several asserts in the
Hi, Beman
In examples for release procedure you are using: merged_to_1_26_2. While
in Release Procedures for the Release Manager section you are mention:
merged_to_RC_n_n_n. What is correct?
Gennadiy.
P.S. Could you, please, clarify for me again what is the purpose of this
tag? How does it
A few months ago, Aleksey posted a cool way of doing lambda using function
notation. I hadn't followed the thread at the time, but I read up on it
recently. Like many others, I found it hard to understand how it worked, so
I asked Aleksey if he could make a minimal example of it, which he did.
31 matches
Mail list logo
