[boost] shared_ptr rebind

2003-03-31 Thread Ben Young
Hi, I was wondering whether anyone had thought about adding a rebind nested template class to the boost ptrs, similar to those used by allocators. A situation has recently occurred where I need to get a ptr to a derived class from a pre to a base class, where the ptr to the base class is used a

Re: [boost] Threading, boost_1_30_0, Linux, glibc-2.3.2

2003-03-31 Thread Neal D. Becker
Here is some more on this problem. Perhaps someone on this list has some ideas where to look? Defining BOOST_NO_THREAD (or whatever it was) will fix the problem, but I suspect it's not the correct fix. The code will link OK dynamically, but not statically. That's strange.

[boost] adding a generic list manipulator

2003-03-31 Thread Reece Dunn
My post dated March 30 2003 11:17AM should have had this heading, but I forgot to add a subject so it got named (no subject). You can find the details of that post at: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1587184 -rhd- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [boost] Problems compiling microsec_time_clock with cygwin/gcc

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Garland
I get the following error when trying to compile date_time/microsec_time_clock.hpp from the current CVS with cygwin/gcc. C:/Packages/boost/work/boost/date_time/microsec_time_clock.hpp:44: parse error before `;' token I believe there are issues supporting the C interface used by the

[boost] Re: Problems compiling microsec_time_clock with cygwin/gcc

2003-03-31 Thread Michel André
Thnx! Will you please keep me posted/updated? Regards /Michel Jeff Garland wrote: I get the following error when trying to compile date_time/microsec_time_clock.hpp from the current CVS with cygwin/gcc. C:/Packages/boost/work/boost/date_time/microsec_time_clock.hpp:44: parse error

RE: [boost] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Paul A. Bristow
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Reece Dunn Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [boost] (no subject) Thanks for repackaging the code inside zip, and for mor examples, and making it work 'strictly' MXVC

[boost] bad_lexical_cast

2003-03-31 Thread Alisdair Meredith
I see that this has been the topic of much discussion lately, but just confirming this little warning from the regressions has not snuck by unnoticed: # 'boost::bad_lexical_cast::what()' hides inherited virtual function 'std::exception::what() const' [const missing, to state the obvious] This

[boost] Re: When to use which ETI workaround?

2003-03-31 Thread Andreas Huber
Sorry for the late reply, got too many things on my plate. No problem, I happen to have abandoned development on MSVC7.0 temporarily, for other reasons. Yep, in most cases that's enough. It's _always_ enough with MSVC 6.0, but 7.0 sometimes uses another, unknown, type for the instantiation's

RE: [boost] indentation algorithm for stream objects

2003-03-31 Thread Hartmut Kaiser
Reece Dunn wrote: This utility class provides a mechanism for adding indentation to an I/O stream. I was wondering who would be interested in it, or if anyone has anything similar. [snip] I'm very interested in such a functionality, but your attachment seems to be broken. Could you

Re: [boost] indentation algorithm for stream objects

2003-03-31 Thread Larry Evans
Reece Dunn wrote: This utility class provides a mechanism for adding indentation to an I/O stream. I was wondering who would be interested in it, or if anyone has anything similar. This sounds like marg_ostream. See: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1526216

[boost] Threads Lib and DLL Issues

2003-03-31 Thread David Brownell
When using the current version of the boost threads DLL, the thread DLL appears to link with the DLL version of the RTLs. While this works on the machine that compiled the exe, it does not work when moving the exe to a different version of Windows. For example, I am developing on a Win XP

Re: [boost] bad_lexical_cast

2003-03-31 Thread Terje Slettebø
From: Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] I see that this has been the topic of much discussion lately, but just confirming this little warning from the regressions has not snuck by unnoticed: # 'boost::bad_lexical_cast::what()' hides inherited virtual function 'std::exception::what()

[boost] Re: Using variant library with Boost 1.30.0

2003-03-31 Thread Eric Friedman
Allen Bierbaum wrote: I have been very impressed with the Variant library and started using it with Boost 1.29. Good to hear. I'd be interested in your experience using the library in a real-world (?) application. I now need to start to using Boost 1.30.0 though and I don't think the

[boost] linux regression box upgrade

2003-03-31 Thread Alkis Evlogimenos
FYI: the linux box running the daily regression tests has been upgraded to Mandrake Linux 9.2 (gcc 3.2.2 / glibc 2.3.1). -- Alkis ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost