Andrei Alexandrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, I believe what would be more interesting for Boost is the
recent article (http://www.cuj.com/experts/2106/alexandr.htm), written by
Petru Marginean and myself. (Warning - the article has recently been
updated.)
We have good
Mike Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, there is another advantage, which (I think) is at least as
important as the ones you cite. Namely, it is possible to define a built
in operator such that is_convertibleY,X returns false for
class X{};
class Y : X {};
This one is
Justin M. Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're missing the point. Personally I see the need for out and
in/out params. While some of you may not like them, I use them, as
do others. The question then becomes, when reading my code, would
you rather see
f(x,y,z);
or
f(out(x),
Reece Dunn wrote:
In the file:
spirit/wave/wave/cpplexer/slex/cpp_slex_lexer.hpp
I have noticed two points that may be bugs (but have not verified
through compilation.)
1 line 335:
[332] // C++ only token definitions
[333] template typename IteratorT, typename PositionT
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrei Alexandrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, I believe what would be more interesting for Boost is the
recent article (http://www.cuj.com/experts/2106/alexandr.htm), written
by
Petru Marginean and myself.
David Abrahams wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, I believe what would be more interesting for Boost is the
recent article (http://www.cuj.com/experts/2106/alexandr.htm),
written by Petru Marginean and myself. (Warning - the article has
recently been
updated.)
Andrei Alexandrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I browsed the article (I confess to not having read everything, so
please correct any misapprehensions). My sense is that the technique
is oriented towards detecting programmer errors and responding via an
exception.
No.
Please correct my
Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I browsed the article (I confess to not having read everything, so
please correct any misapprehensions). My sense is that the technique
is oriented towards detecting programmer errors and responding via an
exception.
I don't think ENFORCE is oriented
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I browsed the article (I confess to not having read everything, so
please correct any misapprehensions). My sense is that the technique
is oriented towards detecting programmer errors and responding via an
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This one is sticky.
class Y : X { true_type f() { return is_convertibleY,X::type();
} }; false_type x = is_convertibleY,X::type();
I'm not sure I see the problem here. If is_convertible is a built in
compile
I don't think it's reasonable to compare how things are done in the standard
library to how things are done in actual code. The standard library is
STANDARD, we all KNOW what it does, and how it behaves, and it's documented
all over the place.
My code on the other hand, it's not standard, you
Mike Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This one is sticky.
class Y : X { true_type f() { return is_convertibleY,X::type();
} }; false_type x = is_convertibleY,X::type();
I'm not sure I see the problem here.
David Abrahams wrote:
Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I browsed the article (I confess to not having read everything, so
please correct any misapprehensions). My sense is that the
technique
is oriented towards detecting programmer errors and responding via
an exception.
I don't
Justin M. Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think it's reasonable to compare how things are done in the standard
library to how things are done in actual code.
I didn't make that comparison. Most of my code is not in the standard
library.
The standard library is STANDARD, we all
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Further, suppose I write a metafunction:
template class T
struct is_const_and_int_convertible
: and_
is_constT
, is_convertibleT,int
{};
Mike Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Further, suppose I write a metafunction:
template class T
struct is_const_and_int_convertible
: and_
is_constT
,
16 matches
Mail list logo
