Original Message
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++.moderated
Subject: Re: OO design: Is "errno" Exception?
References: ... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Early Ehlinger wrote:
>
> "Alexander Terekhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Early Ehlinger wrote:
> > [...]
Chuck Messenger wrote:
Peter Dimov wrote:
Chuck Messenger wrote:
[snip]
Well, it's in too much flux right now -- perhaps if I ever finish it,
I'll post it. It's a concurrency library - an implementation of the API
described in Concurrent Programming in ML.
[snip]
Thanks -- that sounds interesti
Schoenborn, Oliver wrote:
Circular refs are easy to avoid with smart_ptr lib but idiomatically what
you are really looking for is DynObj (and maybe RRef ) in the NoPtr lib
(http://noptrlib.sourceforge.net). Strict ownership is ideal for pimpl and
in particular your example of circular dependency, a
> The undefind reference comes from posix_api.o . I guess that
> s_match_vtable is not used in that file.
You bet it is, you would get the unresolved external if it wasn't being used
:-)
> >> On MacOS X using g++ version 3.3 in addition to the linker problem I
> >> had to make all the functions y
> but that just instantiates what I currently need in my code and is no
> real solution.
I agree completely.
> Why do you manually build these vtables and don't use virtual functions?
Because they're dispatched based upon a numeric ID stored in the state
machine.
John.
__
On Thursday 22 May 2003 12:51, Maarten Hilferink wrote:
> template struct sequence_array;
> which has an interface that is almost compatible with
> std::vector >;
> but faster.
and more compact I presume. AFAICT the drawback will
be that the sequece is not as dynamic anymore as a
vector-of-vector
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:28:27AM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Hi Pavol,
>
> Pavol Droba wrote:
>
> > I have been reading the discussiong here about adding the support for
> > unicode.
> >
> > Maybe there is a solution which would allow to have templated versions of
> > relevant classes AND st
Trevor Taylor wrote:
Who? Me?
I think Peter meant Alexander
Cheers
Russell
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Are you planning to implement a "real" pthread_refcount_t for, say, Windows
and Linux/x86?
Who? Me?
No, I no nothing about any of this (as I've just demonstrated), it just
seemed from your "Maybe one day we'll have a pthread_refcount_t"
statement that things could be improved if one existed - so
Tanton Gibbs wrote:
>> I realize that header file is easy. But that approach will bit sooner or
>> later. It probably would be possible to supply alternative header-only
>> option, but that would be a lot of work. Need to find more opinions here.
>>
>> BTW, if you have problems with shared librari
Hi Pavol,
Pavol Droba wrote:
> I have been reading the discussiong here about adding the support for
> unicode.
>
> Maybe there is a solution which would allow to have templated versions of
> relevant classes AND static library in one box.
>
>
> If we decide that specialization for char and wc
11 matches
Mail list logo
