Dear Boosters,
The enable_if library defines the enable_if and disable_if templates,
which are tools for controlling which function templates are included
in the overload resolution set based on the properties of the argument
types.
The following example demonstrates their use:
template
typenam
Maxim Egorushkin wrote:
>
> "Alexander Terekhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Maxim Egorushkin wrote:
> > >
> > > "Alexander Terekhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > Maxim Egorushkin wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
"Alexander Terekhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Maxim Egorushkin wrote:
> >
> > "Alexander Terekhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Maxim Egorushkin wrote:
> > >
> > > [... "ala Alexandrescu" volatiles ...]
> > >
> >
John,
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:34, John R. Bandela wrote:
> I was playing with the new iterator adapters in the sandbox. As I was
> looking at filter_iterator, I found that it allows user code to increment
> it like a random access iterator. Here is an example that compiled on VC
> 7.1
I've c
James Curran wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > IANALBIPOOTN.
>
> um... I Am Not A Lawyer But I Play One On ...
The Net.
regards,
alexander.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
--On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:06 PM -0400 James Curran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
IANALBIPOOTN.
um... I Am Not A Lawyer But I Play One On Television{what}?
What's the N?
The Net !?
___
Unsubscribe & other chan
Alisdair Meredith wrote:
[...]
> The advantage of a single, separate file is that it is much less
> paperwork for an audit team to review.
I'm afraid that you're way too "optimistic" with respect to paperwork. It
might not be a best example... but here's a message [kinda "abridged"] from
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> IANALBIPOOTN.
um... I Am Not A Lawyer But I Play One On Television{what}?
What's the N?
--
Truth,
James Curran
www.noveltheory.com (personal)
www.njtheater.com (professional)
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: h
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
Hi Fernando,
[snip...]
Besides, no one except you seems to be interested in multiindex_type :(
If only some boosters jump into this discussion I'm sure many interesting
insights would be provided.
I'm interested in this discussion but generally keep my mouth shut o
Gregory Colvin wrote:
> This seems like a lot more trouble than just pasting our
> brief license into every source file.
The advantage of a single, separate file is that it is much less
paperwork for an audit team to review. They only need confirm all files
link to the same license, not that the
On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 12:06 AM, Schoenborn, Oliver wrote:
I have experimented (actual working code) with what you're
looking for. But the tools are *experimental* and not ready for prime
time public use.
So have I.
Just to be clear, what I was working with required both an experimental
On Wednesday, Jul 2, 2003, at 02:42 America/Denver, Paul A. Bristow
wrote:
| In non-Boost code, I've seen wording something like "See the attached
| license; if it is missing see www.foo.org/license." Maybe something
like
| that is what will be recommended.
|
| They've already signed off on the c
Hi Joaquín,
I'm probably just misunderstanding your class.
So I'll wait for you to upload the documentation and
I will repost the issues then.
Best
Fernando Cacciola
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boo
Hi Fernando,
Fernando Cacciola ha escrito:
[...]
> I understand the current design but I'm not sure if it defines the concepts
> correctly, which is IMO the first important thing to get right.
> So let's see:
>
> >From a C++ user perspective, your class is an Associative Container.
> An associat
I am just re-posting this response, since my first attempt to Cc it didn't
work:
The "Relational Template Library" is not a part of Boost (although we would
eventially like it to be). We introduced it about a year ago, and got
little response at that time. The library then included a relation
Schoenborn, Oliver wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 08:21 PM, Schoenborn, Oliver wrote:
>>
>> >> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 17:36 America/Denver, Schoenborn, Oliver
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 14:38 America/Denver, Boost wrote:
>>
>> > Why is there no
Another possible place - but Digital Object Identifiers are the Right Way to Do
It, I believe. All the scientific journals are using it - but it may cost too
much.
Paul
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexander Terekhov
| Sent: Wednesd
Paul A. Bristow wrote:
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Evans
[snip]
I can see much logic in your layout (much more perhaps than in the C language!)
but sadly, I think the balance of pros and cons is in favour of sticking to a
consi
Posted to files area as "http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/filter
streams.zip"
HTH
Paul
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
Mobile mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -Original Message-
| From
Hello,
I have question regarding the pool library.
In my application I read a lot of data records from a database
into a small data class and therefor I thought object_pool could help me
to reduce memory consumption.
So I wrote:
class OuterClass
{
...
class row{
...
private:
...
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 11:45 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
There's also:
http://pcroot.cern.ch/TaligentDocs/TaligentOnline/DocumentRoot/1.0/
Docs/books/FS/FS_59.html
whose TInstanceOf or TOnlyPointerTo may be what your wanting.
Interesting, thanks for the link.
TInstanceOf appears to have copy
"Paul A. Bristow" wrote:
[...]
> May I suggest consideration of what happens in a decade or two when boost.org
> might not longer exist to provide a reference, but we still need to ensure that
> the license terms are still available.
http://web.archive.org/web/2229041743/http://www.sco.c
John,
John R. Bandela wrote:
Should filter_iterator use iterator_facade as its base instead of
iterator_adapter? It seems the iterator_adapter is incorrectly implementing
advance.
I wouldn't say that it is incorrectly implementing advance. AFAICS the
problem is that there is no way to restrict th
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Evans
| Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 3:07 PM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] Re: filtered/decorated streambufs
| > What advantages does your style have?
[big snip]
|
I can see mu
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Beman Dawes
| Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:23 PM
| To: Boost mailing list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [boost] Draft of new Boost Software License
|
|
| In non-Boost code, I've seen wording somethin
Maxim Egorushkin wrote:
>
> "Alexander Terekhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Maxim Egorushkin wrote:
> >
> > [... "ala Alexandrescu" volatiles ...]
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=3EE84807.DD00F4D0%40web.de
> > http://groups.google.com/gro
26 matches
Mail list logo
