Eric Friedman wrote:
> Aleksey (and others),
Hi Eric,
> I'm working on getting variant to compile under MSVC 6, but I've come
> across what seems to be an ETI problem that needs a workaround.
>
> However, I'm not sure what is the most appropriate way to make the fix.
The most common way to deal
Beman Dawes wrote:
I've expanded the FAQ entry to read:
Why has class semaphore disappeared?
Semaphore was removed as too error prone. The same effect can be
achieved with greater safety by the combination of a mutex and a
condition variable. Dijkstra (the semaphore's inventor), Hoare, and
Bri
The last 3 or 4 times that I have tried to check out the "latest
boost", the checkout
gets most of the way through, and then hangs.
Here's what I see in my terminal:
lots of lines snipped
cvs server: Updating boost/tools/inspect/build
cvs server: Updating boost/tools/regression
cvs serve
I was writing a little article on the topic Its not finished i will
finish it tonight.
In the mean time take a look at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/21_strings/howto.html#3
I looked into the efficiency of stringtok function (from above link) as
opposed to C's strtok and the good news i
At 09:22 AM 6/4/2003, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>hi there,
>
>I'v been trying to find some info as to why semaphores
>are considered harmful by the boost::thread authors,
>without luck. Is there any concise text describing
>the problem ?
I've expanded the FAQ entry to read:
Why has class semaphore dis
Aleksey (and others),
I'm working on getting variant to compile under MSVC 6, but I've come
across what seems to be an ETI problem that needs a workaround.
However, I'm not sure what is the most appropriate way to make the fix.
Below is the error output from the regression tests (variant_test1)
Greetings!
The problem:
-
AFAIK, the two[1] libs built from boost always result in e.g.
libboost_thread.so. The problem is that currently no OS has support for
embedding the required ABI[2] into the runtime-linker info, therefore it only
knows a libray name.
When it finds a library
I couldn't find this topic disscussed before, is it possible to use
tokenizer directly with an ifstream - instead of reading the contents of the
file into a string first?
Thanks,
Eoin.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/li
> > I don't know about the other libraries? Is there a standard for this in
> > boost or is it up to the libraries? Should they be commonised?
Thorsten Ottosen wrote
> Ideally, yes. I would prefer .c_str() for const char* conversion and
> str() for std::string
In date-time there are several
> It's only minor:
>
> But boost::filesystem and boost::date_time have string conversion
> methods such as
>
> string()
> native_file_string()
> to_simple_string()
>
> where as boost::format (and also stringstreams in the STL) have
>
> str()
>
> I don't know about the other libraries? Is there a
10 matches
Mail list logo
