Brian Oberholtzer wrote:
I'm trying to use shared_ptr in Forte 5.4 and am getting a link-time error
like the following indicating an undefined reference...
The error includes the following hint:
Hint: static member
boost::__RTTI__1nFboostPchecked_delete4CpnDstMbasic_string... must be
defined in the
Hi,
I'm trying to use shared_ptr in Forte 5.4 and am getting a link-time error
like the following indicating an undefined reference...
The error includes the following hint:
Hint: static member
boost::__RTTI__1nFboostPchecked_delete4CpnDstMbasic_string... must be
defined in the program. To me it
Support Requests item #776424, was opened at 2003-07-23 18:03
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=207586&aid=776424&group_id=7586
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolut
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:45:13 -0400, David Abrahams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The use of char[8] in the type_traits header serves as a kind of
>"anti-documentation", IMO.
IMO too :-)
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/17895
Genny.
Oops, self-correction needed here:
Poses the question of how a const circular_buffer
could be accessed as a const array:
const T * const circular_buffer::data() const
{ ^
??
}
___
Unsubscribe & other cha
I suggest
T * circular_buffer::data();
Poses the question of how a const circular_buffer
could be accessed as a const array:
const T * const circular_buffer::data()
{
??
}
BTW - As question for the boost gurus, is there
some way of capturnig a pointer+size for a memory
block (perhaps poin
At Monday 2003-07-21 01:48, you wrote:
> At Sunday 2003-07-20 04:29, you wrote:
[deleted]
> >Yes, I remain unconvinced ;-)
> >This is because some compilers do not provide such a FUNCTION facility.
> >VC6 is one of them. What should I do for it?
>
> don't do anything. VC6 has been replaced. If
Hi,
I recently submitted a bug regarding handling certain letters in unix,
and got a response from Vladimir Prus pointing out the need of using
boost::filesystem::native-argument to b::f::path constructor.
It seemed to help a bit, but.. Let me demonstrate:
Source-code of a utility to remove thos
John Torjo wrote:
> I've been using date_time, and it's really cool!
Thanks.
> However, I would have a small request:
> For time iterators: we have hours(), minutes(), seconds(), but no days().
>
> Of course, instead of days(1) we can have hours(24), still I think it's more
> expressive to have
Jan Gaspar wrote:
> I think, I changed mind. The flatten() method can be substituted by
> something like this:
>
> void doSomething(const int* pInt, size_t numInts); // C API
> circular_buffer intBuffer(10);
> ...
> // fill the buffer somehow
> vector v(intBuffer.begin(), intBuffer.end());// co
Does ublas require matrix storage be managed by ublas? Is it possible to
construct a ublas matrix that references a plain-old-C-style array?
If not, what is a simple way construct a ublas matrix from a C-style array?
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: h
John Torjo wrote:
time_iterator it( start, days(1) + hours( 12)) instead of:
Why not days(1.5) then? That would be even easier, wouldn't it?
Cheers
Russell
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Daniel Frey schrieb:
I think the OP asked about explicit instantiated
X. Daniel
(Spangenberg), please correct me if I'm wrong, but you question boils
down to something like this:
Correct. But even a simpler example, where everything is inside **one**
namespace,
either the global one or anything
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
> "Jan Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I think, I changed mind. The flatten() method can be substituted by
>> something like this:
>>
>> void doSomething(const int* pInt, size_t numInts); // C API
>> circular_buffer intBuffer(10);
>> .
> The problem, IIRC, is that if wchar_t is just a synonym for
> unsigned short, then unless the wide character handling is
> disabled in lexical_cast, it will give errors if it's used
> with unsigned short (such as in the Date/Time library), and
> people weren't too happy about that, understand
Bugs item #776146, was opened at 2003-07-23 02:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=107586&aid=776146&group_id=7586
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Pr
"Jan Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think, I changed mind. The flatten() method can be substituted by
something like
> this:
>
> void doSomething(const int* pInt, size_t numInts); // C API
> circular_buffer intBuffer(10);
> ...
//
> fill the buffer somehow
Hi,
I've been using date_time, and it's really cool!
However, I would have a small request:
For time iterators: we have hours(), minutes(), seconds(), but no days().
Of course, instead of days(1) we can have hours(24), still I think it's more
expressive to have days(1).
For instance, if I want
I think, I changed mind. The flatten() method can be substituted by something like
this:
void doSomething(const int* pInt, size_t numInts); // C API
circular_buffer intBuffer(10);
... //
fill the buffer somehow
vector v(intBuf
David Abrahams wrote:
You're right.
Only WRT some limited points, but probably not in general :)
It works because the base classes of T are
"associated" in:
struct myclass : X {};
I think the OP asked about explicit instantiated X. Daniel
(Spangenberg), please correct me if I'm wrong, but yo
Daniel Frey schrieb:
> They needn't be visible for myclass. They only need to be visible in the
> namespace where this happened. See 3.4.2/2:
>
> "If T is a class type, its associated classes are the class itself and
> its direct and indirect base classes. Its associated namespaces are the
> nam
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ok, it would be possible.
>
> Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to add helper function 'flatten()' into
> > circular_buffer?
> >
> > After invocation, user would be sure of:
> >
> > &buff[0] < &buff[1] <
Support Requests item #776095, was opened at 2003-07-23 00:40
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=207586&aid=776095&group_id=7586
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolut
23 matches
Mail list logo
