--- Bohdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it is, but AFAIK it doesn't have cpp files.
std::streams really have cpp files and are part of
standart,
but if i don't mind they are not part of STL. Am i
wrong ?
Maybe, I am
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: RE: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think now we need to
Eric Friedman wrote:
The variant library developers were checking in changes
almost daily
until a week or two ago, so you might want to make sure
you have the
latest from CVS.
Thanks for your response.
Yes, I have the latest CVS (Boost::HEAD) snapshot. BTW this error
shows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
|-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|Hash: SHA1
|
|Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
|
|| What is the problem adapting pair of iterators to scalar vectors to
|produce
|| an iterator with complex value type?
|
|The problem is you can
Thanks Janusz. I've checked in the fixes.
On Saturday, August 9, 2003, at 12:27 PM, Janusz Piwowarski wrote:
Hi all
I've found bug in incremental_components examples and
documentation. Type _Rank_ is expected to be size_type, but
container _rank_ is created from vertex_descriptor. Examples work
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 20:00:08 +0100, Paul A. Bristow wrote
I suggest that I wait for the 30.1 release to be available, retest
with strict mode and then mail you off-list with results from .net
2003 aka 7.1.
Do you mean 1.31.0 or 1.30.2? The changes I'm speaking of are not
in 1.30.2. I expect
David B. Held [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Don't pass metafunctions directly; it's bad for interoperability.
Then you get a metafunction taking a template template
parameter, and you can't use it in lambda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Philippe A. Bouchard
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: GUI sublanguage ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
After having followed this thread I
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
As a user of the filesystem library, I am having the experience that
obvious things are hard to find, and the docs are much harder to
understand than they ought to be.
[...]
Just out of curiosity, is the
Hi,
I read today all this thread because this subject is very interesting.
I know I am coming very late so I don't want to re-ignite the discussion again
Just to put a word
I have some doubts about the TraitsImpl approach, as opposed to the pImpl
approach.
On one side the use of template can
In that case, you might prefer to mail me off-list a zip of your most recent
version.
This might help you get a MSVC 7.1 strictly tested version ready for 1.31.0
Paul
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Garland
| Sent: Saturday,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
|1) Since only 1 object can be passed to the iterator adaptor
|constructor, I
|had to pass a pair.
|
|
| Use object generators.
|
|
|2) Distance uses only one of the base iterators.
|
|
| Use minimal distance.
Different
RTFM again :-((
Except that even knowing that answer, I couldn't get the help system to help.
But Thanks
Paul
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
| Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 8:38 PM
| To: Boost mailing list
|
Paul A. Bristow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I'm persuaded.
Yet another thing one needs to know and my brain is already full :-(
Since I couldn't find how to make the editor work with .ipp files from the MS
documentation, but it ws kindly provided by a diligent Booster, can you suggest
--- Bohdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, how can I use boost::threads with my toy
operating system?
If you are writing application for your toy OS, you
should :
1. Edit boost::thread implementation to
At 08:06 PM 8/9/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
As a user of the filesystem library, I am having the experience that
obvious things are hard to find, and the docs are much harder to
understand than they ought to be. The use of creative naming really
gets in the way. For example, the term complete
John Torjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eugene,
one more thing when you implement the GUI library.
I ALWAYS hated the message maps from MFC/WTL.
So now I came up with a quite cute method of automating registering of events
for a given window.
(this should work
At 01:13 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0
Oh well. I guess there are some details missing from the release
manager's responsibilities on
Daryle Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Yikes!! The X in Mac OS X has NOTHING to do with X-Windows!
I didn't mean to suggest that it does.
(The Mac's X is for the Roman numeral for ten.) Macs use an
independent GUI API. But, like Windows, there are
Currently boost array contains a copy of the array that initialized it.
Is there any reason that boost array can't be enhanced to contain a reference
to the original C array? I think this would make it more useful
to me as well as others.
Robert Ramey
- Original Message -
From: Fredrik Blomqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released
Shouldn't the documentation for function and signals be added when your're
making an official release also?
Yep, we
- Original Message -
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Boost mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: UI++ [was: GUI sublanguage; Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI
template library]
[...]
Well, a
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh, and I really want the ability to select layers
1 and 2 at runtime,
in
a
single place in my code, on a per top-level window
basis.
Let's just try to get it working first. I don't
doubt that we could do
this but is it worth the cost
Recently there was idea about spirit-like dialog sublanguage
implemented in c++. I still can't get why someone may need
it ?
Spirit is forced to use such language to build QUOTED code, which
works only when parsing occur. In case of GUI lib
sutiation is different :
We are not building code, but
---BeginMessage---
I have found that there are some changes are needed for Eric Ford Units system
in ebf_units.zip (in the files section)
to meet the requirements of MSVC 7.1 - I presume to comply with C++ Standard
better.
(I surmise that other recent compiler versions will also require this).
--- Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exporting/importing C++ classes is completely
implementation dependent, due
mainly to name mangling, and requires a DLL for a
particular
platform/compiler/release to be built.
There are several issues with DLL and C++, to name
few:
1. Name
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian McNamara
| Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 5:43 AM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Preliminary submission: FC++
|
|
| Based on David's suggestion, I'll try to briefly define all the
Peter Dimov wrote:
I think that this specialization is ill-formed if the primary swap isn't
in std. Your code is broken by STLport's tricks, even though it looks
correct. :-)
I think this is the consensus.
Try
template void std::swap( empty lhs, empty rhs )
{
}
instead and see if it
David Abrahams wrote:
Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Boosters,
Since some of the applications and libraries we plan on releasing soon
rely on Boost features and bugfixes that are in the CVS but not in
Boost 1.30.[012] I wonder what the plans are for the Boost 1.31.0
Brock Peabody wrote:
On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Don't know where to start...
Greek and Roman mythology?
[...]
Other ideas:
Atlas
ATLAS: Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra Software
http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/
f.
___
Unsubscribe other
At 05:58 PM 8/9/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes:
OK, what do others think? Am I the only one who feels uncomfortable
with
the SF-trackers?
Nope; I dislike them also. That doesn't mean trackers in general are
a bad idea.
I'm not happy with the S/F trackers
At 01:32 AM 8/9/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
I uploaded a new test file for the I/O state saving classes over a
month ago. How do we get the regression test guys to use the new file
instead?
Add to or otherwise modify the Jamfile that drives the test?
Looks like the io tests are specified in
At 11:29 PM 8/7/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
At Thursday 2003-08-07 17:28, you wrote:
cvs server: [11:59:06] waiting for anoncvs_boost's lock in
/cvsroot/boost/boost/libs/numeric/mtl/test
cvs server: [15:35:09] waiting for anoncvs_boost's lock in
/cvsroot/boost/boost/libs/numeric/mtl/test
At 05:27 PM 8/7/2003, Bo Persson wrote:
Paul A. Bristow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(And other MS specific unhelpful warnings which could be dealt with
by
#ifdef _MSC_VER or BOOST_?
#pragma warning (disable : 4800) // inefficient bool conversion?
#endif
As a general point, is there any
At 07:30 PM 8/6/2003, Joel de Guzman wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:54 AM 8/5/2003, Brock Peabody wrote:
I don't know much about other GUI systems but win32
and MFC. I think we can try to define the low-level
layer using win32 and/or MFC as the starting point.
If
At 01:39 PM 8/8/2003, Martin Wille wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
I would be interested in
hearing about the plans for a Boost 1.31 release
As far as I know the CVS is in very good health at the moment. The
only major thing
David Abrahams wrote:
As far as I know the CVS is in very good health at the moment.
Uhmm, I really wouldn't say so! If you look at the main trunk report -
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/resources/cvs_main_trunk/developer_summary_page.html,
there are lots of regressions comparing
Peter Dimov wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Consider the following snippet:
void show_warning( message_dialog const, user_message );
void post_command( boost::functionvoid() );
int main()
{
boost::functionvoid( user_message ) f(
bind(
38 matches
Mail list logo
