[This was originally posted on the Users list. I'm posting the
response here to the main list because I have no idea how to fix it.
This message isn't cross-posted to the Users list because I used
different e-mail addresses to subscribe to each list.]
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 4:56 PM, R
"David Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oops,
>
> I was about to suggest that Boost skip support for both GCC, Intel and
> VC++ entirely, and mainly focus on the Borland compiler running on
> Windows 98. I had better withdraw that suggestion then...
>
> /David
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Cons
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 11:35 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> At 06:38 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >>
> >> >I need to make a mapping over paths. Is there any important reason
> >> >there's no operator<
I've just uploaded the preliminary version of my XML library to Yahoo files
section as xml_library.zip. Comments are welcome.
Regards,
Wojtek
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
At 11:35 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> At 06:38 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>> >I need to make a mapping over paths. Is there any important reason
>> >there's no operator< provided?
>>
>> I don't think it has been discussed. I've had
At 11:01 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> At 04:49 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>> >
>> >This name, too, seems sorta redundant. Seriously, my mind forgets
>> >the "file_" in the middle every time I use it and I've had a bunch of
>> >stupi
Oops,
I was about to suggest that Boost skip support for both GCC, Intel and
VC++ entirely, and mainly focus on the Borland compiler running on
Windows 98. I had better withdraw that suggestion then...
/David
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
In our last exciting episode David Abrahams wrote:
> Lines: 21
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt)
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:xHnNZYZvlhxQjoXn7OJygCVNff4=
> Jaakko Jarvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi Boosters,
> >
> > We submitted enable_if for formal review in Jul
[snip]
> Spamcop looks like an excellent service; I'm planning on signing up
> for it myself in the next month or so, but it will not protect
> against virii (such as this current attack) AFAIK.
Yes it does, I can tell from personal experience (you get a notification
when this happens):
http://mai
Jaakko Jarvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Boosters,
>
> We submitted enable_if for formal review in July. The library does
> not seem to be on the review queue, and maybe it is not worth a full
> review.
I would be happy to leave that up to Thomas Witt, the review wizard.
As a matter of fact
"Iain K. Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 13:20, David Abrahams wrote:
>> Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> All true. Unfortunately, 2.96 was released by RedHat with one popular
>> >> version of Linux, which makes it (in many peoples' eyes) an important
>
Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed
>> > for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to
>> > the supplier
The following simple script reveals 138 e-mail addresses affected in
this
way (it also picks up on pserver: anonymous connections, since they
look
like e-mail addresses):
grep -EIhor --exclude=*.pdf
[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[a-zA-Z0-9_+-
]+\)*
boost | sort | uniq
Or maybe we just ban people fro
hi,
what is needed for the lexicographic class to be included into boost?
if it is a formal review (probably a really short one) i want to request
it. maybe it can also be reviewed together with other utility components.
the current version is in the boost-sandbox and consists of the
following
David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed
> > for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to
> > the supplier of the compiler (i.e. redhat).
>
> I am notici
Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> our mailing lists page advertises boost-install as the list for
>> installation assistance, but it really isn't for user questions at
>> all. I plan to remove it from that page unless there are strong
>> objections.
>
> Perhaps,
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
> Stefan Slapeta wrote:
>
>>
>> Is there any special reason why there has never been any fixed point
>> library submitted to boost? IMHO, there would be much more reasonable
>> applications for that than for a floating point lib.
>
> Yeah, a fixed point library is al
OK let's CC Samuel Krempp to make sure he's seen it.
Paul Hamilton wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This will work, although I had
>>
>> template inline
>> void empty_buf(BOOST_IO_STD basic_ostringstream & os) {
>> os.str( std::basic_string() );
>> }
>>
>>
David Abrahams wrote:
our mailing lists page advertises boost-install as the list for
installation assistance, but it really isn't for user questions at
all. I plan to remove it from that page unless there are strong
objections.
Perhaps, it would be better to describe the exact purpose of the list
our mailing lists page advertises boost-install as the list for
installation assistance, but it really isn't for user questions at
all. I plan to remove it from that page unless there are strong
objections.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 13:20, David Abrahams wrote:
> Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> All true. Unfortunately, 2.96 was released by RedHat with one popular
> >> version of Linux, which makes it (in many peoples' eyes) an important
> >> compiler to support anyway.
> >
> > I will in
Hi all!
Another beast was born. You can find it at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/circular_buffer.zip
New features:
- Added circular_buffer_space_optimized adaptor + documentation.
- Introduced circular_buffer::data() method.
- Updated documentation (including source code documentation
> From: Rozental, Gennadiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > I've got at least 400 mails (until it filled my mailbox several
> > > times) with it by now. I do not know proper solution. I still would
> > > like to provide
> > > email address for support. But 99% of traffic on that account are
> > > vi
Geurt Vos wrote:
I mean, is boost bjammed correctly for thread
support? The thing is that the following code
segfaults on '-pthread'
#include
int main()
{
*boost::filesystem::directory_iterator("/");
}
# g++ -o test test.cpp -lboost_filesystem
# ./test
--- no problem
# g++ -pth
>
> > boost-1.30.2, SuSE Linux 8.2, GCC-3.3:
> >
> > an #include results in
> > #error Thread support not available!
> >
> > It seems that since 1.30.2 on Linux it is
> > disabled by default, correct? why?
> >
> > gcc.hpp reads:
> >
> > #if [...] !defined(linux) && !define(__linux) && !define(__
>
> > boost-1.30.2, SuSE Linux 8.2, GCC-3.3:
> >
> > an #include results in
> > #error Thread support not available!
> >
> > It seems that since 1.30.2 on Linux it is
> > disabled by default, correct? why?
> >
> > gcc.hpp reads:
> >
> > #if [...] !defined(linux) && !define(__linux) && !define(__
26 matches
Mail list logo
