Geurt Vos wrote:
I mean, is boost bjammed correctly for thread
support? The thing is that the following code
segfaults on '-pthread'
#include boost/filesystem/operations.hpp
int main()
{
*boost::filesystem::directory_iterator(/);
}
# g++ -o test test.cpp -lboost_filesystem
#
From: Rozental, Gennadiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got at least 400 mails (until it filled my mailbox several
times) with it by now. I do not know proper solution. I still would
like to provide
email address for support. But 99% of traffic on that account are
viruses or spam.
Hi all!
Another beast was born. You can find it at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/circular_buffer.zip
New features:
- Added circular_buffer_space_optimized adaptor + documentation.
- Introduced circular_bufferT::data() method.
- Updated documentation (including source code
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 13:20, David Abrahams wrote:
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All true. Unfortunately, 2.96 was released by RedHat with one popular
version of Linux, which makes it (in many peoples' eyes) an important
compiler to support anyway.
I will in line with the
our mailing lists page advertises boost-install as the list for
installation assistance, but it really isn't for user questions at
all. I plan to remove it from that page unless there are strong
objections.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
OK let's CC Samuel Krempp to make sure he's seen it.
Paul Hamilton wrote:
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will work, although I had
templateclass Tr, class Ch inline
void empty_buf(BOOST_IO_STD basic_ostringstreamCh,Tr os) {
os.str( std::basic_stringCh, Tr() );
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
Stefan Slapeta wrote:
Is there any special reason why there has never been any fixed point
library submitted to boost? IMHO, there would be much more reasonable
applications for that than for a floating point lib.
Yeah, a fixed point library is also
Martin Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
our mailing lists page advertises boost-install as the list for
installation assistance, but it really isn't for user questions at
all. I plan to remove it from that page unless there are strong
objections.
Perhaps, it would be
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed
for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to
the supplier of the compiler (i.e. redhat).
I am noticing a theme in
hi,
what is needed for the lexicographic class to be included into boost?
if it is a formal review (probably a really short one) i want to request
it. maybe it can also be reviewed together with other utility components.
the current version is in the boost-sandbox and consists of the
following
The following simple script reveals 138 e-mail addresses affected in
this
way (it also picks up on pserver: anonymous connections, since they
look
like e-mail addresses):
grep -EIhor --exclude=*.pdf
[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[a-zA-Z0-9_+-
]+\)*
boost | sort | uniq
Or maybe we just ban people
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed
for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to
the supplier of the compiler
Jaakko Jarvi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Boosters,
We submitted enable_if for formal review in July. The library does
not seem to be on the review queue, and maybe it is not worth a full
review.
I would be happy to leave that up to Thomas Witt, the review wizard.
As a matter of fact two
[snip]
Spamcop looks like an excellent service; I'm planning on signing up
for it myself in the next month or so, but it will not protect
against virii (such as this current attack) AFAIK.
Yes it does, I can tell from personal experience (you get a notification
when this happens):
In our last exciting episode David Abrahams wrote:
Lines: 21
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xHnNZYZvlhxQjoXn7OJygCVNff4=
Jaakko Jarvi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Boosters,
We submitted enable_if for formal review in July. The
Oops,
I was about to suggest that Boost skip support for both GCC, Intel and
VC++ entirely, and mainly focus on the Borland compiler running on
Windows 98. I had better withdraw that suggestion then...
/David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
At 11:01 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 04:49 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
This name, too, seems sorta redundant. Seriously, my mind forgets
the file_ in the middle every time I use it and I've had a bunch of
stupid compiler errors
At 11:35 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 06:38 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
I need to make a mapping over paths. Is there any important reason
there's no operator provided?
I don't think it has been discussed. I've had the need myself,
I've just uploaded the preliminary version of my XML library to Yahoo files
section as xml_library.zip. Comments are welcome.
Regards,
Wojtek
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 11:35 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 06:38 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
I need to make a mapping over paths. Is there any important reason
there's no operator provided?
I don't
David Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oops,
I was about to suggest that Boost skip support for both GCC, Intel and
VC++ entirely, and mainly focus on the Borland compiler running on
Windows 98. I had better withdraw that suggestion then...
/David
g
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
21 matches
Mail list logo
