pe with later.
To the best of my knowledge, the compiler isn't yet being shown - I
believe that they're looking at getting the IDE side of things working,
and then will bring the compiler along once that's done.
>Any volunteers:-?
er discussion is probably off topic, unless
we're trying to learn lessons from its design to apply to Boost
candidates.
Alan
--
Alan Bellingham
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
es to a library, we want it to be as efficient as
possible consistent with safety. In this case, we rigourously inspect
the code (by eye, and by linting) and determine that the line in
question actually is unnecessary.
Alan
--
Alan Bellingham
___
Unsubscribe &a
ar * ptr = new char [12]; // points to (ergo, refers to) resource
char * ptr2 = ptr+4 ; // points _into_ resource
Alan
--
Alan Bellingham
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Terje Slettebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>in this thread, void * is type erasure. More or less the only safe thing you
>>>can do with it, is to delete it. You can also cast it back to its original
[snip David Abrahams demurral]
>Of course, it depends on whether the type supports polymorphic deletio
