> >
> >
> I had a look. It looks interesting, however I couldn't compile it with
VC7,
> I assume because of partial specialization you are using.
> I have compiled it with gcc 3.2, just to see how tests are working, and
> it worked just fine.
Thanks for trying. Portability has not really been add
Pavol,
To make things clear, I do not want to sound like I am opposing to what you
are doing. I really think that these algorithms are usefull and very usable.
Only point I want to emphasise is the necessity to have these algorithms
implemented in string oriented fassion (maybe in parallel with ge
like types compatible with basic_string so that they can reuse string
utils. In a practical sence I got pretty close to what I was trying to
achieve, but conceptually the proper solution for this would require some
standard revisions.
Best regards.
Alexei Novakov
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
"Pavol Droba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:03:49PM -0500, Alexei Novakov wrote:
> >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> Well, in the current state, the string_algo librar
where this would fit in with the proposed new string lib, plus I'm pretty
> short of time at present. Still I'm hoping someone can make use of this
and
> maybe the new string lib can include a synthesis of all these ideas...
I have uploaded
>>
>
> Cool, I'd definitely use it
> Seeing as there is a move to submit a library of string helpers at the
> moment it might be worth submitting this at the same time!
>
> Vin
>
I have uploaded headers and unit tests to
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/sub_string.zip
Give it a try. Any
"Pavol Droba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:48:09PM -0500, Alexei Novakov wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Alexei.
> > >
> > > Cool, I'
"Vincent Finn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Alexei Novakov wrote:
> > "Vincent Finn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
ecialization of basic_string which has advantages:
> > a) familiar interface;
> > b) possibility to reuse the code written for basic_string (like
> > string streams, lexical casts, etc).
> >
> > Any interest?
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Alex
