demonstrate his/her intent explicitly.
>>
>> Other than the additional typing (the "required boilerplate"), are
>> there other more fundamental objections?
>
> The fundamental objection is that you should not penalize the majority
> because someone "might ne
When is the release of 1.31.0 planned? Within weeks or months?
Will the variant library be part of 1.31.0?
Thanks,
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response
m" dialog box with every page.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Hamish Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 09:09, Anthony Williams wrote:
> > What's wrong with just having boost::shared_ptr and
> > boost::shared_ptr, boost::shared_ptr ?
> >
> > You could have each node store a boost::weak_pt
, so you can retrieve the document from it, but it doesn't keep
it alive. Consequently, if you erase an element from the document, but you
still have a pointer to it, then the element itself is OK, but it will then
die when your pointer goes out of scope. Also, if the document goes out of
scop
.net/projects/axemill) to fulfil most of
these goals, with the eventual goal of submitting it to boost. If you want to
contribute code and/or ideas, please email me. Currently, it requires gcc 3.2
(though it should build with other relatively conforming compilers) and boost
1.29.0 (I intend to move t
Vladimir Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anthony Williams wrote:
>
> > Vladimir Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Shame about the "NT symlinks not supported yet" errors...
> >>
> >> Hmm... I hope someone more knowledgeble
Anthony Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see now that with your tuple iterator, you are
> > aiming much higher than I previously thought. Just
> > like boost's transform iterators, my combining
> >
ntion, and it might be that
there is sufficiently little to make it not worth sharing, but I thought it
worth exploring.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Anthony Williams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OTOH, the situations I am thinking of require that
> > the tuple of containers is
> > really treated as a container of tuples, complete
> > with the abil
Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 26 Mar 2003, Anthony Williams wrote:
> > > It strikes me that if you dereference n iterators,
> > you have n values, and the
> > most natural way to store them is a tuple.
> Once again: The big picture is that
Douglas Paul Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26 Mar 2003, Anthony Williams wrote:
> > It strikes me that if you dereference n iterators, you have n values, and
> > the most natural way to store them is a tuple. Doing anything other than
> > returning
Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anthony Williams wrote:
> > The particular example I cited in the
> > article is where a colleague
> > had a pair of vectors which were the x and y values
> > respectively for a
> > graph. They were supplied
Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anthony Williams wrote:
> > IMHO, it seems more logical to split the concept, so
>
> > the grouping of
> > the iterators is separated from the transformation
>
> By "separating the grouping and the trans
cept, so the grouping of the
iterators is separated from the transformation, and the existing transforming
iterator adapter can be used for that part. I would be happy to work with you
on a submission --- I have been meaning to submit my pair iterators to boost
since I wrote them.
Anthony
--
Anthony
t its 5.3.4/10. I missed it.
That's only for char arrays directly allocated with new themselves, not char
arrays that are members or have automatic or static storage duration.
You need to look at boost::aligned_storage (which is part of boost::optional
IIRC)
Anthony
--
Anthony Willi
The link to Cargill's article in more/generic_exception_safety.html is no
longer valid. The correct link is:
http://www.awprofessional.com/content/images/020163371x/supplements/Exception_Handling_Article.html
(Why it is a "supplement" to More Effective C++ is beyond me)
Anth
"Phil Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Anthony Williams]
> > On Windows, for example, you can use GlobalAlloc to allocate some memory,
> and
> > you get an HGLOBAL back --- a handle to the memory. You need to call
> > GlobalLock with that handle to g
there has been an intervening GlobalUnlock). Indeed, the
pointer to the locked memory is essentially a separate resource, acquired with
GlobalLock() and released with GlobalUnlock. It would be sensible to be able
to use the same framework for both the handle and the pointer.
Anthony
--
Anthony
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 05:27 AM 2/20/2003, Anthony Williams wrote:
>
> >Is there something up with the boost list today? I haven't received
> >anything
> >on the list since yesterday, though a quick check on gmane indicates that
>
dded for the
case where the resource was something else which had a clear-cut interface
that was desirable.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Is there something up with the boost list today? I haven't received anything
on the list since yesterday, though a quick check on gmane indicates that
there has been activity.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for t
e for class T.
* which() is documented to return "int", when the implementation returns
"unsigned int".
* extract() is badly named, as it retrieves a reference-to-T, not a T ---
how about extract_reference()?
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran
pyConstructible
requirement isn't actually verified with a concept check, but you'd have to
get the requirement dropped if you were to rely on it (which would probably
mean implementing templated constructor/reset/operator= to avoid _having_ to
use an optional to initialize you
I qualify myself as a "Boost technical expert"?
IIRC, you are interested in attending because you live near Oxford. If this is
the case, if you speak to Lois Goldthwaite ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) you can join
the UK Standards panel, and attend as a UK rep.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Softw
es, in
the boost working directory
7. "cvs update" on the boost working directory
8. label the new version in boost CVS
Of course, you still have to avoid check-ins to both repositories.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when
Fernando Cacciola writes:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anthony Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [boost] Formal review: Opti
a
reference to the value, you can get its address, if necessary.
I prefer the member interface to the non-member interface, in this instance.
You might like to use the techniques from my StrongStorage class (see the
boost files section on yahoo) to ensure integrity in the face of exception
orage." and "An object has a type
(3.9). The term object type refers to the type with which the object is
created." so void is not an object type, since you cannot create objects of
type void, as it "is an incomplete type that cannot be completed." (3.9.1p9)
; Object* const placed_new (Storage* const storage) {
>new (storage) Object;
>return ...;
> }
>
> // .. support construction with (1, 2, 3, ...) parameters as well
Because that gets you nothing vs just using placement new directly.
> "Eric Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anthony Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | > You made youself clear.
> | >
> | > However, there are two running issues originating from a claim of Dave
> | > that dangerou
Eric Woodruff writes:
> "Anthony Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Thus, given that h.storage is properly aligned, (which is the purpose of
> the
> > other union member), after &
Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
> Anthony Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Anthony Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > [...]
> | >
> | > | 3.10p15:
> | > | "If a program attempts to access the store
Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
> Hi,
Hi
> Anthony Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | 3.10p15:
> | "If a program attempts to access the stored value of an object through an
> | lvalue of other than one of the following types the behavi
of(T) bytes starting at
static_cast(h.storage) (since that is what was passed to placement
new), so static_cast(pfoo)==static_cast(h.storage) if pfoo is
the value returned from the new expression.
Thus
static_cast(static_cast(pfoo))
==static_cast(static_cast(h.storage))
==pfoo
and we're legal.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Glen Knowles writes:
> From: Anthony Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >The SleepyCat license is convered here:
>
> As a paying licensee of SleepyCat I can atest that it is more unsuitable
> then you indicated. The "free" license requires that all the source
.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License/Sleepycat_License
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mail
not make
assumptions.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
David Abrahams writes:
> Anthony Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > David Abrahams writes:
> > >
> > > Do we have any precedent for ways to find out what the arity and
> > > argument types of an arbitrary function object is (I'm
ber-functions; I've a feeling that you'll have to partially
specialize get_pointer_to_member_details for each member function type you
want to match (number of args and cv-qualification)
HTH
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instru
, rather than just abort compilation)
Does this give you what you want?
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Gennaro Prota writes:
> On 14 Nov 2002 12:40:38 +0000, Anthony Williams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I have uploaded lexical_compare.hpp to the yahoo files area. It contains
> >implementations of the function template lexicalCompare.
>
> Just
hands on the code.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
gt; first sequence is equivalent to the second
>0 => second sequence is less than the first
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
___
Unsubscribe &
Edward Diener writes:
> "Anthony Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message news:15826.2782.569000.619636@;gargle.gargle.HOWL...
> > Edward Diener writes:
> > > Finally I would like a non-partisan answer from you to my next question
> and
>
rs from reading the property map docs ?
As Jan Langer pointed out, there are specific pages for each of the property
map categories. If you missed these you will have difficulty piecing
everything together.
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments
at you can store the reference for
later use, or pass it to another function, and is actually the key benefit of
using operator[] rather than plain get()/put().
Anthony
--
Anthony Williams
Senior Software Engineer, Beran Instruments Ltd.
Remove NOSPAM when replying, for timely response.
_
47 matches
Mail list logo
