Re: [boost] CW8 on Mac OSX

2003-06-30 Thread Chris Little
on 6/30/03 10:58 AM, John Phillips at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was looking at the regerssion testing and I noticed that there are no > results for Metrowerks Codewarrior 8 on Mac OS X. Is there a problem that > leads to not including this result or is there just a lack of a test > platform? >

Re: [boost] Re: Draft of new Boost Software License

2003-06-26 Thread Chris Little
on 6/26/03 1:24 PM, Alexander Terekhov at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Howard Hinnant wrote: >> >> Since boost is a spring board for standardization of a library, I'm >> wondering if the boost license requires the copyright notice to follow >> for other implementations which follow the interface

Re: [boost] Darwin regression tests

2003-03-11 Thread Chris Little
on 3/11/03 11:45 AM, Beman Dawes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 11:01 AM 3/11/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote: > >> The must be something wrong with the current darwin regression tests, >> AFAICT. I just completed a full regression run of the latest RC >> version and I get far lower failure rates

Re: [boost] Mac OS (Darwin) failures?

2003-02-18 Thread Chris Little
on 2/18/03 10:58 AM, Beman Dawes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In looking at the Mac OS (Darwin) regression tests to see why there are so > many failures, a number of tests are failing with only this message: > > /usr/local/boost/boost/type_traits/is_float.hpp:22: warning: use of `long > double'

Re: [boost] FW: Boost Unit Test Framework: Localisation hiccups

2002-11-30 Thread Chris Little
on 11/25/02 4:54 AM, Rozental, Gennadiy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Dear Gennadiy, >> I've just been trying out the latest (1.29.0) release of the Boost > > Unit Test Framework. I ran into a few minor localisation hiccups you >> might want to be told about. > >> I'm using Metrowerks Codew

Re: [boost] Boost License Issues

2002-11-25 Thread Chris Little
on 11/25/02 2:13 PM, Paul A. Bristow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So should we use > "Copyright (c), 2002, A N Author" > > to cover as many countries/lawyers as possible? > > But do we need to update the year for each release (perhaps twice a year?)? > > What significance does the year have? >