Hi Andreas,
I've taken the liberty of starting a new thread to talk about these
inter-FSM protocol issues as they don't related directly to your current FSM
lib submission.
For the benefit of people cruising the archives at a later date, this
conversation derives from this exchange:
[snip]
Andreas wrote:
So, IMO there's no need for boost::fsm to provide communication protocol
primitives, because their functionality is pretty orthogonal to what my
library does. Users would want to use what they're accustomed to. Most
would
presumably use boost::function.
... but given
Hello,
I've got a struct derived from boost::default_dfs_visitor that I've been
using w/out any problems in an invocation of boost::depth_first_search.
The call that works looks like:
boost::depth_first_search(g, boost::visitor(MyDfsVisitor));
^- NP. compiles and executes fine.
Now I'm trying to
Apologies - this is a _user_ list question. I've moved the discussion to the
appropriate list. Please don't continue this thread here. - Regard Chris
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
submission and I'll post a write-up of my experiences
working it into my plug-in subsystem later this month for your
consideration.
- Regards
Chris Russell
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
I've created a new page on the Wiki to gather opinions/suggestions on
features/requirements for an XML processing library.
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?LibrariesUnderDiscussion
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostXMLDiscussion
I read through the documentation but haven't tried coding against the
library yet. It looks quite useful for building isolated FSM mechanisms. I
observe in my own work that I typically have many FSM that interact with
each other. It could be argued that this is really just one large FSM, but I
The terminology tutorial is excellent. Thanks - that's helpful. So my
question should have been:
Has any thought been given to the protocol(s) necessary to use the FSM
library for building systems (by Scott's definition).
DOT
That was a little bit of tongue in cheek. Not entirely a serious
I'm delighted to hear that you want to use the library in a real-world
project but I must also warn you: You'd be the first to do so!
It's been argued by many Venture Capitalists that there's absolutely nothing
real world about my project. But I digress ;-)
Intel should be quite conformant
For what it's worth, I've had great success using James Clark's expat to
populate directed graphs abstracted by a BGL adjacency list. I'm too busy to
document and submit to the sandbox at the moment but that should give anyone
interested enough information to go do it. Parenthetically, I've found
Kudos to Kwee H. Tan for a great BGL article in this month's CUJ! Make sure
to read it and let it sink in... There are far-reaching implications IMHO if
you read between the line a bit.
- Regards
Chris
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
s:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Chris Russell wrote:
Let me first describe my heterogeneous container hack and perhaps you
could
point why it's poor (your feel better on a quick read of your paper and
this
is a good way to help us all understand this a bit better).
My goal was to be able to use stan
] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 22:37, Chris Russell wrote:
Hi Emily, I just read your paper and think it's excellent. A while ago
(some
months past), I think I hacked together a solution to a similar problem
and
made a men
13 matches
Mail list logo
