- Original Message -
From: Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 6:31 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: partial proposal
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
[...]
Given the fact optional::m_storage is aligned like a bool...:
It is
Hi!
I'm under the process of getting rid of some of my old
smart pointers replacing them by shared_ptr.
There is however one idiomatic usage that it's pretty
hard to locate and edit, so I wondered if shared_ptr
could support it.
One is initialization from a null pointer value, as in:
struct C
{
Kevin, we're currently in the middle of a release and a formal review...
If you wait a week or so.. and recall our attention, you're likely to get a
response.
Just hold on.
Thanks,
Fernando Cacciola
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
OK, I can see the motivation: We can have a noncopyable class
and need an optional object of it.
Following optional semantics, it would be spelled:
boost::optionalRAII_lock lock;
if ( cond )
lock.reset( RAII_lock(entity) ) ;
But there
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] 'optional' - request for extension
Aleksey Gurtovoy writes:
The following is a sketch of a potential use case for
