ed to be their readers?
What information is one supposed to gleam from perusing them?
What should one walk away from them knowing or saying?
--
Greg Comeau/ 4.3.0.1: FULL CORE LANGUAGE, INCLUDING TC1
Comeau C/C++ ONLINE ==> http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout
World Class
s mentioned in another
post, for instance, running VC++ with /Za and then again
without /Za... well, not only can the results be completely
different but the underlying premise of the builds are as well.
--
Greg Comeau/ 4.3.0.1: FULL CORE LANGUAGE, INCLUDING TC1
Comeau C/C++ ONLINE ==> http:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Misha Bergal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >I've been working with
;s because we know that Windows
>> >headers can't be compiled in strict mode, can they?
>>
>> Greg Comeau has been working on getting the Windows headers to work better,
>> and has asked for error reports where there are still problems. It may be
>> that we will
should be just warnings with --a option. This has been
> >> reported to Comeau.
> >
> >
> >Well, Comeau in strict mode (--a) defines BOOST_DISABLE_WIN32, so it
> >should
> >never include any Windows header. That's because we know that Windows
> >hea
n I'm confused because this implies windows.h is
not necessary in order to achieve passing the test?
I'm fairly certain I did tests which effectively no-op'd
windows.h and there were still MSisms being used. ???
--
Greg Comeau/ 4.3.0.1: FULL CORE LANGUAGE, INCLUDING TC
t; tests fail this way:
> >
> >"'mv' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
> >program
> >or batch file."
>
>That probably means the "como" toolset is being used instead of the
>"como-win32" toolset.
>
>I&#
