[boost] Re: [variant] 2 or more types requirement

with two types. This is a good point. Thanks. -- Itay Maman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message expresses my personal opinion. ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Re: Formal review of Variant Library (Ed B.)

volatile object. A destructor shall not be declared const, volatile orconst volatile (_class.this_). const and volatile semantics(_dcl.type.cv_) are not applied on an object under destruction."--Itay Maman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED][The above message expresses my personal views].

[boost] Re: Formal Review: Variant Library

-Itay Rodolfo Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message b2tm6v$9o7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b2tm6v$9o7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... How different is boost::any from this new variant library? Don't they address the same issue? In short: (1) boost::any can accept a value of any possible type.

[boost] Re: RE:Formal Review: Variant Library

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].. ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Re: RE:Formal Review: Variant Library

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].. ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Re: Formal review or Variant Library (Ed B.)

"David B. Held" wrote: [...] template typename T void operator()(const T operand) const { operand.~T(); } [...] Is the destructor really a const function? Dave The object being destroyed is the formal parameter "operand". The object whose operator() is called is not changed at all, thus

[boost] RE:Formal Review: Variant Library

(I appologize for the two awkward replies I had sent before. It seems that my news client and myself have some issues to resolve...) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] 2) The Visitor concept brings a couple questions to mind: a) Why allow modification (termed "persistency" in the docs)? No other

[boost] Re: Re: Formal Review: Variant Library

Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... At 02:49 PM 2/18/2003, Itay Maman wrote: Rodolfo Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message b2tm6v$9o7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b2tm6v$9o7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... How different is

[boost] boost::variant - Status + Formal Review

) will take place at 15-24th February. The Review manager is Jeff Garland. Eric Friedman Itay Maman ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost