Thanks Beman,
>No, including the Boost license doesn't make your source open. There is
>nothing in either the new or old Boost licenses which requires that
source
>code be redistributed or otherwise made available.
I understand the intention and realize that this is the way it has
always been. I
>Matt Hurd wrote:
>>
>> >The author of a derivative work can put in a more restrictive
license
>> >right? In this case, wording that gives the full Boost permission
must
>> >still be included according to the draft license.
>> >This would lead to
>The author of a derivative work can put in a more restrictive license
>right? In this case, wording that gives the full Boost permission must
>still be included according to the draft license.
>This would lead to a license text like:
I am a little confused. Like Jaarko, I read it as viral.
If
I see in the Wiki a couple of comments about variance/std dev with n and n-1
being referred to at the denominator. Just to clear it up:
when it is a complete population the denominator should be n.
when it is a random sample it is n-1.
sample variance = sum(Xi - mean(X))^2/(n-1)
or more usefull
> -Original Message-
> Behalf Of Alisdair Meredith
> Subject: [boost] Re: resource manager naming
>
> Larry Evans wrote:
>
> > Would the GOF name, proxy, be too non-specific? Policy names
> might provide
> > the specifics (whether it's a pointer or a resource).
>
> Proxy, if anything,
