Replying to myself sorry...
> Quite right. This was related to the QueryPerformanceCounter() using the
> 8254-compatible real-time clock which could take several thousand cycles.
> The HAL of Pentium's and above should use Intel's RDTSC (Read Time Stamp
> Counter) and not suffer this problem.
Ap
> -Original Message-
> On Behalf Of Beman Dawes
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 March 2003 1:15 AM
> Be careful. At least with some older versions of Windows, the execution
> time for some of the Windows time related API's was so large that the
> useful resolution was nowhere near the apparent clai
