Visual C++ 6.0 doesn't support partial template specialization.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of DudeSan
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [boost] A problem concerning msvc++ and
boost::spirit::
In http://www.boost.org/libs/spirit/doc/number_list.cpp.html,
using namespace spirit
should read
using namespace boost::spirit;
I think. Apologies if this is the wrong list for such an unimportant
report ;)
- Michael
___
Unsubscribe & other changes:
KL> 2) Although both POSIX and C99 define them to be 2's complement integers
KL> with the appropriate number of bits, neither standard sets a requirement
KL> on byte ordering within the multibyte types. Thus, even if a platform
KL> supports them (say, the BSD family), the binary form of the inte
>> If you aim for portability, you can simply use int8_t, int16_t, etc.
>> in your implementation - no need to use it in the archive interfaces
>> as far as I get it. Sorry if I miss the point :)
> If a library user wants his archives to be portable he has to use
> int8_t, int16_t, etc.. for all da
DG> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> We should discuss whether to use short, int, long ... as the primitive
>> types or int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, int64_t. The latter makes it easier
>> to write portable archives, the former seems more natural. I can
>> accept both choices but we should not mix the two as
