RE: [boost] Files of types *.ipp are unfriendly, especially to MSVC ?

2003-08-14 Thread Randy Bowen
for template implementation files internally.) Whether use of ".ipp" as a standard extension is a good idea is, of course, a different discussion. Randy Bowen Stamps.com > -Original Message- > From: Paul A. Bristow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 08,

RE: [boost] Re: Re: Better Intel-Win32 support

2003-06-05 Thread Randy Bowen
> A disappointing aspect of this in regards to MSVC 7.0+ is > that there is no preprocessor macro ( as of 7.0, I haven't > checked 7.1 yet ) which MSVC defines for distinguishing > native C++ wide character from the previous typedef for > wchar_t. The MS-specific macro _NATIVE_WCHAR_T_DEFINED

RE: [boost] Re: ublas and VC++7.

2003-05-22 Thread Randy Bowen
7.0. (Sorry -- I can't offer any data on the effect for any other compilers.) Randy Bowen Stamps.com ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost