Hi,
I am trying to find regression test results for gcc-3.3 on linux and
Intel 7.1 on Linux. Are the meta-intel-7.1 results at
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering for windows or linux?
Does anyone have regression results for gcc/intel on linux?
By the way, these results are really useful,
Hello all,
Recently, I had the following problem in some library code I maintain.
I provide users with a macro which generates fairly complex typedefs:
#define MAKE_TYPEDEF(Ident, etc) typedef complicated Identifier;
Users use the macro to define a bunch of different types, all with
Hi,
for_each seems to be unable to deal with empty lists, or lists that
are built by push_front on an empty list. However, vectors work
fine. Here is code which demonstrates the problem. Replacing list with
vector makes the code compile.
#include iostream
#include boost/static_assert.hpp
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
// (C) Jane Programmer, 2003
// See www.boost.org/license for license terms and conditions
// See www.boost.org/libs/janes-lib for documentation
Looks fine to me, though I prefer Copyright to (C)
Paul
I have been told by previous
Hi all,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
templateclass T void * operator new(size_t n, optionalT t);
Anyway, there are still problems with this: operator new is called _before_
the T is constructed,
Hi,
Just as a note to those scanning files for copyright messages, I was once
informed by lawyers at one of my former employers that the string (C)
(that is, a capital C in parenthesis) has no legal standing - only the
word copyright or the copyright symbol (not available in ASCII) legally
