[boost] Re: A new boost::thread implementation?

2003-02-06 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
s just naming. > You could also consider the merits of providing an implicit conversion > from async_result to T. Possible, but I'd say too confusing. Cheers W. --

Re: [boost] Re: A new boost::thread implementation?

2003-02-06 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
unction yield()" with out also > seeing that it's static? No need to read documentation for that, as it's > an explicit part of the functions signature. Seeing it used in someone else's code? Just not being careful when reading the signature? I think it's the sa

[boost] Re: A new boost::thread implementation?

2003-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
have the time to read the documentation, what will he assume what yield() does? If there's a way to avoid such invitations for errors, one should use it. Regards Wolfgang PS: Can you do me a favor and CC: me? I just get the digests of the mailing list and replying is -- well, tedious ;-)

[boost] Re: A new boost::thread implementation?

2003-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
's going to yield here? I would be most happy if we could cooperate and join efforts. Regards Wolfgang ----- Wolfgang Bangerth email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.tica