[boost] indexed_set (was: Interest in multiindex_set?(again) )

2003-07-20 Thread JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z
Hi again, Discussing a library in Boost is a most exhausting task, but a most rewarding one too. After suggestions from Fernando, Beman, Jeremy and others, I've made many significant improvements to multiindex_set, now renamed to indexed_set. You can download it, along with a test suite and prelim

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again)

2003-07-12 Thread JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z
Hi again, - Mensaje Original - De: Fernando Cacciola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fecha: Sábado, Julio 12, 2003 7:32 pm Asunto: [boost] Re: Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again) [stuff about conceptual structure of multtindex_set deleted] OK, I'm glad we finally got to understand each other :) T

Re: [boost] Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again)

2003-07-12 Thread JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z
Hi Fernando, - Mensaje Original - De: Fernando Cacciola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fecha: Sábado, Julio 12, 2003 1:22 am Asunto: [boost] Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again) > Hi Joaquín, > > Unfortunately, I douldn't compile the code with BCC because it > extensivelyuses non-type template p

Re: [boost] Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again)

2003-07-07 Thread JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z
Hi Beman, - Mensaje Original - [...] > * The "multiindex_set" name seems awkward to me. Maybe > "indexed_set" or > "set_index"? I don't like the name either, and would be happy if someone comes with something better. Nevertheless, I don't think indexed_set is a good choice: when pickin

[boost] Interest in multiindex_set? (again)

2003-06-28 Thread JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z
Hi all, A few weeks ago I prompted for interest in a multiply indexed set container, whth alas little response from the community. In the meanwhile, I continued working in multiindex_set and now the library is 90% completed, save docs. It is available at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files

Re: [boost] Bidirectional map preliminary submission

2003-03-21 Thread joaquin
Hi George - Original Message - From: "George A. Heintzelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, March 21, 2003 7:38 pm Subject: Re: [boost] Bidirectional map preliminary submission [stuff deleted] > > 2. Pollution of namespace boost. > > Apart from bimap, the following types and functio