I personally would like that very much, and as a matter of fact I was going
to write a hash class of my own but didn't have the time yet...
There are some perfect hash functions on the web, my favorite is
http://www.burtleburtle.net/bob/
Yakov
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Maitin-She
On Thursday 12 December 2002 20:06, Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 08:17 PM 12/11/2002, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> >I forgot to mention in my previous post the following proposed ideas:
> >
> >A hash map and hash multimap in which a single value type is specified
> >along with a traits class that
On Friday 13 December 2002 14:50, Beman Dawes wrote:
> Yes, but I think we should try to stick closely to the LWG proposal. In
> fact, it might be an advantage for standardization to have an exact
> implementation. (It might be worth asking Matt Austern how he proposes to
> change the interface to
> Yes, but I think we should try to stick closely to the LWG proposal. In
> fact, it might be an advantage for standardization to have an exact
> implementation. (It might be worth asking Matt Austern how he proposes to
> change the interface to deal with the issues still on the table.)
Absolutel
