Re: [boost] smart_ptr suggestion: smart_ptr.hpp should includeweak_ptr.hpp, etc.

2003-05-29 Thread Peter Dimov
Beman Dawes wrote: > Providing both the fine-grained and the coarse-grained headers lets the > users decide which they prefer. Sounds reasonable. CVS updated. ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] smart_ptr suggestion: smart_ptr.hpp should includeweak_ptr.hpp, etc.

2003-05-27 Thread Peter Dimov
Chuck Messenger wrote: > For convenience, logical continuity, and consistency with other Boost > libraries, you should be able to include all the smart_ptr pieces with > > #include > > Currently, only 4 are included: > > #include > #include > #include > #include > > Mi