Re: [boost] 1.30.0 branch-for-release complete

2003-03-04 Thread Beman Dawes
At 04:01 PM 3/3/2003, Mark Rodgers wrote: Is it time we introduced beta releases into the release procedure? It seems to me that it would be a good idea to tar up 1.30.0 RC and give everyone a chance to try it out and report feedback without having to use CVS. I know CVS puts me off. Questions

Re: [boost] 1.30.0 branch-for-release complete

2003-03-04 Thread Peter Dimov
Beman Dawes wrote: At 04:01 PM 3/3/2003, Mark Rodgers wrote: Is it time we introduced beta releases into the release procedure? It seems to me that it would be a good idea to tar up 1.30.0 RC and give everyone a chance to try it out and report feedback without having to use CVS. I know

Re: [boost] 1.30.0 branch-for-release complete

2003-03-03 Thread Mark Rodgers
Is it time we introduced beta releases into the release procedure? It seems to me that it would be a good idea to tar up 1.30.0 RC and give everyone a chance to try it out and report feedback without having to use CVS. I know CVS puts me off. Questions include How much of a hassle would it

[boost] 1.30.0 branch-for-release complete

2003-03-01 Thread Beman Dawes
The tag is RC_1_30_0 I'm going to take a break for the rest of the weekend, and then we should get together a list of what needs to be done before the actual release. Thanks, --Beman ___ Unsubscribe other changes:

Re: [boost] 1.30.0 branch-for-release complete

2003-03-01 Thread David Abrahams
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The tag is RC_1_30_0 Didn't we agree that we were going to tag the trunk and generally do any merges from the trunk to the branch? This tag appears to be on the branch AFAICT. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com