Re: [boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer

2003-03-05 Thread Phil Nash
[Brian Gray] > A raw memory buffer is a good idea. I've rolled my own on a couple of > occasions, but never tried to mimic the style of the STL. That > approach opens up a couple issues: > > Since we don't know what's stored in the memory buffer (image/audio > data, chars from an input stream, se

Re: [boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer

2003-03-04 Thread Brian Gray
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:24 PM, Larry Evans wrote: Brian Gray wrote: A raw memory buffer is a good idea. I've rolled my own on a couple of occasions, but never tried to mimic the style of the STL. That approach opens up a couple issues: Since we don't know what's stored in the memory bu

Re: [boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer

2003-03-04 Thread Larry Evans
Brian Gray wrote: A raw memory buffer is a good idea. I've rolled my own on a couple of occasions, but never tried to mimic the style of the STL. That approach opens up a couple issues: Since we don't know what's stored in the memory buffer (image/audio data, chars from an input stream, seria

Re: [boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer

2003-03-04 Thread Kevin Atkinson
Attached is my implementation. It is not very well tested yet so be careful. On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Brian Gray wrote: > Since we don't know what's stored in the memory buffer (image/audio > data, chars from an input stream, serialized structs, etc.), it would > be useful to be able to parameteri

Re: [boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer

2003-03-04 Thread Brian Gray
A raw memory buffer is a good idea. I've rolled my own on a couple of occasions, but never tried to mimic the style of the STL. That approach opens up a couple issues: Since we don't know what's stored in the memory buffer (image/audio data, chars from an input stream, serialized structs, etc

Re: [boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer

2003-03-04 Thread Phil Nash
TED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:05 AM Subject: [boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer > > Is there any interest in a vector like container which is designed to make > working with raw memory easy. It is different from a vector (with > the additional assumption that the

[boost] Any Interest In a Raw Memory Buffer

2003-03-04 Thread Kevin Atkinson
Is there any interest in a vector like container which is designed to make working with raw memory easy. It is different from a vector (with the additional assumption that the objects are stored in memory sequentially) is the following ways: The integrator is defined to be a pointer to make