[boost] BOOST_WORKAROUND question

2003-01-24 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
What would be an equivalent of the following #fief, if I want to re-writte it using our new BOOST_WORKAROUND macro? // last checked with 0x561 #if defined(__BORLANDC__) __BORLANDC__ = 0x561 !defined(BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG) Here, 0x561 is the first version requiring the workaround and at the same

Re: [boost] BOOST_WORKAROUND question

2003-01-24 Thread David Abrahams
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What would be an equivalent of the following #fief, if I want to re-writte it using our new BOOST_WORKAROUND macro? // last checked with 0x561 #if defined(__BORLANDC__) __BORLANDC__ = 0x561 !defined(BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG) Here, 0x561 is the first