<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I've extended my pair iterator to be a tuple
> iterator for
> input/forward/bidirectional/random-access iterator
> categories, which was
> relatively painless. I will boostify it, add output
> iterator support back in,
> and test it with VC7.1 as well as g++ 3.2.2
--- Anthony Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, I think we have two contradictory
> scenarios. IIUC, the situations
> you have encountered are where you have a set of
> values in different
> containers that needed to be combined into a single
> value, in which case it
> makes sense t
> On 26 Mar 2003, Anthony Williams wrote:
> > It strikes me that if you dereference n iterators,
> you have n values, and the
> most natural way to store them is a tuple.
--- Douglas Paul Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would agree if tuples and argument passing were
> more closely linked,
>
Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for your comments on the combining iterator.
>
>> David Abrahams wrote: It's a wonderful idea, Thomas!
>> You might look at the Boost sandbox; Jeremy Siek, Thomas Witt and I
>> are trying to finalize the work in the boost/iterator and
>> libs/iter
Thanks for your comments on the combining iterator.
> David Abrahams wrote:
> It's a wonderful idea, Thomas!
>
> You might look at the Boost sandbox; Jeremy Siek,
> Thomas Witt and I
> are trying to finalize the work in the
> boost/iterator and
> libs/iterator directories to replace the current
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas Becker
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [boost] Determining interest in combining_iterator
>
> This email is to determin
> The combining iterator is another iterator adaptor. It
> holds a boost::tuple of iterators. Moving the
> combining iterator in any way causes all member
> iterators of the tuple to move in parallel. Upon
> dereferencing the combining iterator, the dereferenced
> values of the member iterators are
Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recently noticed that the ready-to-use boost now provide almost
> everything that we use, with the exception of the combining
> iterator. But this is a very important one for us, hence the
> proposed submission.
>
> Please comment.
It's a wonderful i
This email is to determine possible interest in a
submission to boost: the combining iterator.
Short Description
=
The combining iterator is another iterator adaptor. It
holds a boost::tuple of iterators. Moving the
combining iterator in any way causes all member
iterators of the t
