On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:59:19PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Would it be desirabe to have such class? I'm thinking about
>
> struct do_nothing {
> template
> void operator()(const T&) const {}
>
> template
>void operator()(const T1& t1, const T2& t2) const {}
>
>
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Hi,
> just now I've nearly comitted the following addition to one of BGL
> headers:
>
> + struct null_property_copier {
> +template
> +void operator()(const V1&, const V2&) const {}
> + };
> +
>
> What stopped me is that is not BGL specific at all. Is there some
> c
