On Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:57 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Toon Knapen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently had a talk with a patent-laywer from Philips. I deduced following
from this conversation (my own interpretation and IANAL)
Copyright is automatic. From the moment you make something, you own the
Bjorn Karlsson and I are wondering if Boost should require copyrights on
Jamfiles.
Obviously if a Jamfile author wants to copyright a Jamfile he or she
creates, that fine.
But what about Jamfiles where the author didn't add a copyright? Do the
lawyers care, or are these files to minor to
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:18 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bjorn Karlsson and I are wondering if Boost should require copyrights on
Jamfiles.
Obviously if a Jamfile author wants to copyright a Jamfile he or she
creates, that fine.
But what about Jamfiles
Beman Dawes wrote:
Bjorn Karlsson and I are wondering if Boost should require copyrights on
Jamfiles.
Jamfiles are part of the build system; they won't become part of
a an executable. So everything is fine when a vendor ships a
binary or a DLL.
However, when Boost is incorporated to some other
At 01:16 PM 2/5/2003, Martin Wille wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
Bjorn Karlsson and I are wondering if Boost should require copyrights
on
Jamfiles.
Jamfiles are part of the build system; they won't become part of
a an executable. So everything is fine when a vendor ships a
binary or a DLL.
