RE: [boost] HTML documentation imported into 1.30.0

2003-03-06 Thread Beman Dawes
At 04:39 PM 3/5/2003, Rozental, Gennadiy wrote: >> There are still a lot of people who use dial-up lines and >> have no viable >> alternative. We need to limit the Boost distribution to core >> files and put >> the other stuff elsewhere. >> >> --Beman > >I believe that sooner or later we will be f

Re: [boost] HTML documentation imported into 1.30.0

2003-03-05 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 03:53 pm, Beman Dawes wrote: > I thought we agreed to make pdf, man, and all formats other than HTML > available on some separate site. Okay. PDF and man pages are available at: http://boost.sourceforge.net/release/ and there are links from libs/libraries.htm.

RE: [boost] HTML documentation imported into 1.30.0

2003-03-05 Thread Rozental, Gennadiy
> There are still a lot of people who use dial-up lines and > have no viable > alternative. We need to limit the Boost distribution to core > files and put > the other stuff elsewhere. > > --Beman I believe that sooner or later we will be forced to prepare per-library download. It's quite a w

Re: [boost] HTML documentation imported into 1.30.0

2003-03-05 Thread Beman Dawes
At 11:44 AM 3/5/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote: >I've imported the BoostBook-generated HTML documentation into the RC_1_30_0 >branch under doc/html. The affected libraries are: Any, Function, Ref, and >Signals. Other than the new directory there should be no effect > >Should we include PDF and/or ma

[boost] HTML documentation imported into 1.30.0

2003-03-05 Thread Douglas Gregor
I've imported the BoostBook-generated HTML documentation into the RC_1_30_0 branch under doc/html. The affected libraries are: Any, Function, Ref, and Signals. Other than the new directory there should be no effect Should we include PDF and/or man pages for these libraries? - The PDFs are abou