[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mattias Flodin) writes:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:57:17AM -0500, Eric Woodruff wrote:
>> It is ridiculous that I can't give access to an inaccessible class. You have
>> to have access to be able to give it? What is the justification for this?
>
> The reason for making things
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:57:17AM -0500, Eric Woodruff wrote:
> It is ridiculous that I can't give access to an inaccessible class. You have
> to have access to be able to give it? What is the justification for this?
The reason for making things private is to say "this is an
implementation detail
According to g++ and comeau, the following is illegal: (The commented line
allows the code to compile.)
class A {
public:
A () {}
~A () {}
private:
class Nested;
//friend class B;
};
class B {
public:
B () {}
~B () {}
private:
friend class A::N