> > There was a message few weeks ago that did not get
> satisfactory answer
>
> hm, I may have missed this message..
Well, like my previous post it ended up with debate about
BOOST_TESTED_AT macro and not this case :)
> you're right there was an inconsistency.
> but the lines you're quoting
Le mer 16/07/2003 à 10:51, Drazen DOTLIC a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> There was a message few weeks ago that did not get satisfactory answer
hm, I may have missed this message..
> IMHO. It's about compiler workaround in boost/format/feed_args.hpp (note
> that we use VC7.1):
> [original]
> #if BOOST_
Hello,
There was a message few weeks ago that did not get satisfactory answer
IMHO. It's about compiler workaround in boost/format/feed_args.hpp (note
that we use VC7.1):
[original]
#if BOOST_WORKAROUND( BOOST_MSVC, BOOST_TESTED_AT(1300))
[fixed]
#if BOOST_WORKAROUND( BOOST_MSVC, <= 1300)
At the
