Re: [boost] Increase in binary size

2003-03-04 Thread John Maddock
I have not tried to figure out where that increase comes from, but the usual suspecs are regex, function and signal since that is what we use most. It shouldn't be regex: there have been a couple of minor patches and a reorganization of the header directory structure, but no significant

Re: [boost] Increase in binary size

2003-03-04 Thread Beman Dawes
At 10:03 AM 3/3/2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I see that when upgrading LyX to use the upcomming 1.30.0 release instead of the 1.29.0 release our binary size increases by more than 125kB... Not sure what goes into your binary size. Does that include source code, tests, examples, and docs?

Re: [boost] Increase in binary size

2003-03-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | At 10:03 AM 3/3/2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | I see that when upgrading LyX to use the upcomming 1.30.0 release | instead of the 1.29.0 release our binary size increases by more than | 125kB... | | Not sure what goes into your binary size. Does

[boost] Increase in binary size

2003-03-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I see that when upgrading LyX to use the upcomming 1.30.0 release instead of the 1.29.0 release our binary size increases by more than 125kB... I have not tried to figure out where that increase comes from, but the usual suspecs are regex, function and signal since that is what we use most. The