Re: [boost] Re: function binding

2002-12-17 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 04:06 am, Greg Dehaas wrote: > When I try your suggestion, I get the error > 'function does not take 2 parameters' > (If I do not use the BINDFUNCTION macros) > > It seems to dislike doing this with parameters > > Greg I would have to see the problematic code before I c

[boost] Re: function binding

2002-12-17 Thread Greg Dehaas
---You wrote...- > The BINDFUNCTION macros aren't actually needed. Anywhere that you would have: > > boost::functionN<...> f; > f = BINDFUNCTION(g); > > You could have just written: > boost::functionN<...> f; > f = g; > > I'd also strongly suggest that you don't u

Re: [boost] RE: Function Binding

2002-12-16 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Monday 16 December 2002 01:39 am, Greg Dehaas wrote: > //Macros for binding functions + methods > #define BINDMETHOD5(object,function) > boost::bind(function,object,_1,_2,_3,_4,_5) > #define BINDFUNCTION5(function) boost::bind(function,_1,_2,_3,_4,_5) > #define BINDMETHOD4(object,function) > boo

[boost] RE: Function Binding

2002-12-15 Thread Greg Dehaas
Thanks to Douglas Gregor for the bind1st and boost::bind help :) I wrote some macros/etc that came out to something like this: //Boost #include #include //Macros for binding functions + metho