[boost] Re: [Boost-docs] Integrating BoostBook documentation withHTMLdocumentation

2003-01-20 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Monday 20 January 2003 01:44 pm, Beman Dawes wrote: > I guess I'm still unsure how the generated HTML docs are going to be > integrated with the rest of the web site and CVS. > > My understanding was that the docs in formats other than HTML would go on a > separate web site, but that the source

[boost] Re: [Boost-docs] Integrating BoostBook documentation withHTMLdocumentation

2003-01-20 Thread Beman Dawes
At 09:48 PM 1/19/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote: >> -- Footer should have a "revised" date. I like the horizon rule, too. > >A "generated" date would be easy; a "revised" date isn't so easy, because >it's not trivial to figure out when something used in the list changed. For this page it proba

[boost] Re: [Boost-docs] Integrating BoostBook documentation withHTMLdocumentation

2003-01-19 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Sunday 19 January 2003 08:25 pm, Beman Dawes wrote: > I'd like to see a bit more refinement first, and understand how the > maintenance works. > > Let's take the last first. What does a developer do to add a new library? If the library documentation is in the BoostBook format, just make sure th

[boost] Re: [Boost-docs] Integrating BoostBook documentation withHTMLdocumentation

2003-01-19 Thread Beman Dawes
At 02:30 PM 1/19/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote: >The alphabetized/categorized list of libraries generated from the BoostBook >documentation now includes all libraries that have (only) HTML >documentation, so it is now possible to replace boost/libs/libraries.htm >with the generated doc/html/librarie