At 02:10 AM 6/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 3:54 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
Hum... I just had a thought. Is it possible to detect if wchar_t is a
typedef at compile time?
Yes, I think so. Won't boost::is_same unsigned short, wchar_t
::value be true if wchar_t is a
Gak! These compiler vendors are going to drive us all crazy! What do they
expect us to do, use ESP to know what compiler options are set?
If you had ESP, then you would know the answer to that :-
John.
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
At 07:58 AM 6/4/2003, John Maddock wrote:
That will certainly work, but you shouldn't have to do that since the
compiler itself defines _WCHAR_T_DEFINED. Since I made the fix earlier
this
afternoon I am able to compile some non-boost code correctly which had
previously be failing.
Just let
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 3:54 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
Hum... I just had a thought. Is it possible to detect if wchar_t is a
typedef at compile time?
Yes, I think so. Won't boost::is_same unsigned short, wchar_t
::value be true if wchar_t is a typedef, and false if a distinct type?
I'll
That will certainly work, but you shouldn't have to do that since the
compiler itself defines _WCHAR_T_DEFINED. Since I made the fix earlier
this
afternoon I am able to compile some non-boost code correctly which had
previously be failing.
Just let me jump in here: you absolutely can not use
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hum... I just had a thought. Is it possible to detect if wchar_t is a
typedef at compile time?
Yes, I think so. Won't boost::is_same unsigned short, wchar_t
::value be true if wchar_t is a typedef, and false if a distinct type?
Yes, but you can't use the
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So this is yet another case (like /Qoption,c,--arg_dep_lookup) where
Boost config code just has to assume the option has been set.
Well, the build system can tell boost what option's in use. That
doesn't help users of other build systems, but I know that
At 07:02 AM 6/2/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Since I made the fix earlier this afternoon I am able to compile
some non-boost code correctly which had previously be failing.
What fix is that...
Fixes to boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp.
I just did a commit of that file that brings it into sync
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being set. I'm not
so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ 7.1.
You may look on test table
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1614864.
(Warning : when
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fresh regression tests are now posted. Here is what changed in the
Intel results, presumably as a result of the intel-win32 changes:
New fails: config/limits_test
integer/integer_traits_test
At 02:50 PM 6/1/2003, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being set. I'm
not
so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ 7.1.
You may look on test table
Pavel Vozenilek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being set. I'm not
so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ 7.1.
You may look on test table
At 03:09 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Pavel Vozenilek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being set. I'm
not
so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ 7.1.
You may look
At 03:08 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fresh regression tests are now posted. Here is what changed in the
Intel results, presumably as a result of the intel-win32 changes:
New fails: config/limits_test
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 02:50 PM 6/1/2003, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being
set. I'm not
so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ 7.1.
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 03:09 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Pavel Vozenilek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being
set. I'm not
so
16 matches
Mail list logo
