On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 10:50 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Fredrik Blomqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released
Shouldn't the documentati
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 01:18 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
>I read on an eXtreme Programming Wiki web-page that the release
>procedure should be automated with a script. This lowers the chance
>that the release procedure has secret steps that only one person knows.
> Maybe we should strive
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>What about release candidates? It wouldn't hurt to have someone else
>>>look at it before calling it a release and it's quite easy to do. All
>>>it costs is some time, but I think we s
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> At 01:18 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
>> >I read on an eXtreme Programming Wiki web-page that the release
>> >procedure should be automated with a script. This lowers the chance
>> >that the release procedure has secret steps
At 01:18 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
>On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 10:50 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Fredrik Blomqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Monday, August 0
David Abrahams wrote:
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What about release candidates? It wouldn't hurt to have someone else
look at it before calling it a release and it's quite easy to do. All
it costs is some time, but I think we should invest a few days in more
stable releases. Also, it'
David Abrahams wrote:
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
release candidate. And if "volunteering" means downloading it and
testing it, then yes, I'd do this.
No, it means managing the next release.
Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot
of work and a big "Tha
At 04:43 PM 8/7/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:
>On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:38:22 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> No, it means managing the next release.
>>
>> Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot
>> of work and a big "Thank You!" to you for doing t
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:38:22 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> No, it means managing the next release.
>
> Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot
> of work and a big "Thank You!" to you for doing this job, but I think it
> requires knowledge whi
- Original Message -
From: "Fredrik Blomqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released
> Shouldn't the documentation for function and signals be added when your'r
Shouldn't the documentation for function and signals be added when your're
making an official release also?
What's the status regarding the new doc-system btw? (too lazy/tired to dig
through the archives right now ;-)
// Fredrik
David Abrahams wrote:
> Version 1.30.1 is a bugfix-only update. See
11 matches
Mail list logo