[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread Daryle Walker
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 10:50 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: - Original Message - From: "Fredrik Blomqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:40 PM Subject: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released Shouldn't the documentati

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread Daniel Frey
Beman Dawes wrote: At 01:18 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: >I read on an eXtreme Programming Wiki web-page that the release >procedure should be automated with a script. This lowers the chance >that the release procedure has secret steps that only one person knows. > Maybe we should strive

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread David Abrahams
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>What about release candidates? It wouldn't hurt to have someone else >>>look at it before calling it a release and it's quite easy to do. All >>>it costs is some time, but I think we s

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread David Abrahams
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Beman Dawes wrote: >> At 01:18 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: >> >I read on an eXtreme Programming Wiki web-page that the release >> >procedure should be automated with a script. This lowers the chance >> >that the release procedure has secret steps

Re: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread Beman Dawes
At 01:18 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: >On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 10:50 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > >> - Original Message - >> From: "Fredrik Blomqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Monday, August 0

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread Daniel Frey
David Abrahams wrote: Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What about release candidates? It wouldn't hurt to have someone else look at it before calling it a release and it's quite easy to do. All it costs is some time, but I think we should invest a few days in more stable releases. Also, it'

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread Daniel Frey
David Abrahams wrote: Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: release candidate. And if "volunteering" means downloading it and testing it, then yes, I'd do this. No, it means managing the next release. Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot of work and a big "Tha

Re: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread Beman Dawes
At 04:43 PM 8/7/2003, Daniel Frey wrote: >On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:38:22 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote: > >> David Abrahams wrote: >>> No, it means managing the next release. >> >> Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot >> of work and a big "Thank You!" to you for doing t

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-14 Thread Daniel Frey
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:38:22 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote: > David Abrahams wrote: >> No, it means managing the next release. > > Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot > of work and a big "Thank You!" to you for doing this job, but I think it > requires knowledge whi

Re: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-10 Thread Douglas Gregor
- Original Message - From: "Fredrik Blomqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:40 PM Subject: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released > Shouldn't the documentation for function and signals be added when your'r

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

2003-08-04 Thread Fredrik Blomqvist
Shouldn't the documentation for function and signals be added when your're making an official release also? What's the status regarding the new doc-system btw? (too lazy/tired to dig through the archives right now ;-) // Fredrik David Abrahams wrote: > Version 1.30.1 is a bugfix-only update. See