"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> I don't know about others, but when I read that three other pointers have
> been removed from the proposal to make it palatable and that there's word
> about a fourth, I start to doubt that
"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There's also a contradiction in there. The document nicely continues
"One of
> > the reasons shared_ptr has been so successful is that in the
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> The smart pointer proposal is unconvincing to me. This, of course, comes
at
> no surprise. There's some conjecture in the reference document at
> http://www.boost.org/libs/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.htm such as "The support
for
> custom deallocato
At 05:47 PM 1/27/2003, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>Q. Why doesn't shared_ptr provide (your pet feature here)?
>A. Because (your pet feature here) would mandate a reference counted
>implementation or a linked list implementation, or some other specific
>implementation. This is not the intent.
>
>Th
At 05:13 PM 1/27/2003, David B. Held wrote:
>"Edward Diener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>b14fuc$hh0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b14fuc$hh0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> b14cq2$2km$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b14cq2$2km$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
At 03:47 PM 1/27/2003, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> At 04:25 PM 1/24/2003, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>>
>> >Just out of curiosity, which boost libraries are likely to be proposed
>to
>> >the committee?
"Edward Diener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
b14fuc$hh0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b14fuc$hh0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> b14cq2$2km$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b14cq2$2km$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > [...]
> > This is yet another bad PR move, bu
"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
b14cq2$2km$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b14cq2$2km$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > At 04:25 PM 1/24/2003, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> >
> > >Just out of c
Andrei Alexandrescu said:
> "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> At 04:25 PM 1/24/2003, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>>
>> >Just out of curiosity, which boost libraries are likely to be
>> proposed
> to
>> >the committee?
>>
>> See http:/
"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 04:25 PM 1/24/2003, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>
> >Just out of curiosity, which boost libraries are likely to be proposed
to
> >the committee?
>
> See http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2
At 04:50 PM 1/24/2003, Gennaro Prota wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:43:28 -0500, Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>A "full proposal" must include proposed wording for the actual
standardese
>>to go in the TR, as well as the usual supporting material. (Note that
the
>>committee may not
At 04:25 PM 1/24/2003, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>Just out of curiosity, which boost libraries are likely to be proposed to
>the committee?
See http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1397.html
--Beman
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:50:42 +0100, Gennaro Prota
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there any danger than
"that" :-)
Genny.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:43:28 -0500, Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>A "full proposal" must include proposed wording for the actual standardese
>to go in the TR, as well as the usual supporting material. (Note that the
>committee may not act on the proposal right away, or may request revi
Just out of curiosity, which boost libraries are likely to be proposed to
the committee?
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:43:28 -0500, Beman Dawes wrote:
> The deadline for submissions of full proposals for C++ Standard Library
> Technical Report is the committee meeting April 7-11 in Oxford, UK.
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
