[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-29 Thread Misha Bergal
Vladimir Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think it's better to wait for Unicode users to formulate what's needed. It seems, for example, that the last approach would work better for me on Linux. Visual C++ int wmain( int argc, wchar_t* argv ) {

[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-29 Thread Vladimir Prus
Hi Misha, Misha Bergal wrote: Vladimir Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think it's better to wait for Unicode users to formulate what's needed. It seems, for example, that the last approach would work better for me on Linux. Visual C++ int wmain( int

Re: [boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-27 Thread John Torjo
- does not work for wchar_t. While this might seem silly, it's not, since VC allows for a TCHAR* command line string. I have to consider this. An obvious approach would be to add template parameter to every class, telling which char type to use. So investigation is needed to find

Re: [boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-27 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 05:44 PM, John Torjo wrote: - does not work for wchar_t. While this might seem silly, it's not, since VC allows for a TCHAR* command line string. I have to consider this. An obvious approach would be to add template parameter to every class, telling which char type to

[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-27 Thread Vladimir Prus
Chuck Messenger wrote: Vladimir Prus wrote: Chuck Messenger wrote: Vladimir Prus wrote: Yep. This question was raised already. I think that making templates out of all classes is *a* solution, but I'm not sure it's *the* solution. The problem is that extensive template usage would prevent

Re: [boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-22 Thread Vladimir Prus
Chuck Messenger wrote: * Library-managed default values I think it good idea. Need to flesh some details a bit. See http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Library-Mana ged_Default_Values_-_Program_Options_Suggestion Replace default_value() with optional 3rd arg

[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-22 Thread Carl Daniel
Vladimir Prus wrote: Holger Grund wrote: It expands to 13103077 (RTM). Thanks! BTW, what's RTM? Release To Manufacturing. -cd ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

2003-05-22 Thread Chuck Messenger
Vladimir Prus wrote: Chuck Messenger wrote: * Library-managed default values I think it good idea. Need to flesh some details a bit. See http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Library-Managed_Default_Values_-_Program_Options_Suggestion Replace default_value() with