[bringing to list again]
Hi David,
David A. Greene wrote:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
-fcopyPropagation={--maxTransforms=32 --keepStats}
Hmm... that's pretty interesting example. While I'm not sure how
Gennadiy's
code can handle such things, I have some ideas w.r.t my library.
Good! Glad I
David A. Greene wrote:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
I have one policy that I forgot to mention: chain_lookup_policy. It's
work
is based on Chain of responcibilities Design pattern. In this case Every
parameter knows how to parse itelf out of input. And this
identification may
not be the name at all.
[2003-01-21] David A. Greene wrote:
>Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
>>> I have one policy that I forgot to mention: chain_lookup_policy. It's
>>> work
>>> is based on Chain of responcibilities Design pattern. In this case Every
>>> parameter knows how to parse itelf out of input. And this
>>> identifica
Vladimir Prus wrote:
I have one policy that I forgot to mention: chain_lookup_policy. It's
work
is based on Chain of responcibilities Design pattern. In this case Every
parameter knows how to parse itelf out of input. And this
identification may
not be the name at all.
I would say that it's a
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
your submission: a) None of 5 compiler configurations installed on my XP
could not compile it.
:-(
I've made some corrections recently. Did anything improve?
I've tried version you announced yesteday.
Hmm... can you provide error messages?
Is it possible to take a
Gennadiy,
About month ago, while working on Boost.Test issues I was faced with the
need for the more or less full featured command line argument parser. I
recall that you were working on one and took a look on some of your
preliminary code in vault area.
What code, specifically? The only think
Hi, Volodya.
About month ago, while working on Boost.Test issues I was faced with the
need for the more or less full featured command line argument parser. I
recall that you were working on one and took a look on some of your
preliminary code in vault area. And ... was really disappointed. I do no
Hartmut,
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
First of all, let me say, that I'm very interested in trying to use your
program_options library for our ongoing Spirit based C preprocessor
sample. So I've looked at your code immidiatly after your announcement.
I plan to more thoroughly test your code and design,
